» Articles » PMID: 19956164

Uptake in Cancer Screening Programmes: a Priority in Cancer Control

Overview
Journal Br J Cancer
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Dec 4
PMID 19956164
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Achieving adequate levels of uptake in cancer screening requires a variety of approaches that need to be shaped by the characteristics of both the screening programme and the target population. Strategies to improve uptake typically produce only incremental increases. Accordingly, approaches that combine behavioural, organisational and other strategies are most likely to succeed. In conjunction with a focus on uptake, providers of screening services need to promote informed decision making among invitees. Addressing inequalities in uptake must remain a priority for screening programmes. Evidence informing strategies targeting low-uptake groups is scarce, and more research is needed in this area. Cancer screening has the potential to make a major contribution to early diagnosis initiatives in the United Kingdom, and will best be achieved through uptake strategies that emphasise wide coverage, informed choice and equitable distribution of cancer screening services.

Citing Articles

The association of demographic and socioeconomic variables with cancer screening participation: A national cross-sectional study of three cancer screening programs in Denmark.

Helgestad A, Andersen B, Njor S, Larsen M Heliyon. 2024; 10(13):e31163.

PMID: 39044972 PMC: 11263647. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e31163.


The role of vaccine literacy and health literacy in the health prevention decision-making process.

Isonne C, Marzuillo C, Villari P, Baccolini V Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2321675.

PMID: 38445564 PMC: 10953609. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2321675.


Age and cancer type: associations with increased odds of receiving a late diagnosis in people with advanced cancer.

Mills S, Donnan P, Buchanan D, Smith B BMC Cancer. 2023; 23(1):1174.

PMID: 38036975 PMC: 10691149. DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11652-1.


Barriers to breast and cervical cancer screening uptake among Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic women in the United Kingdom: evidence from a mixed-methods systematic review.

Bolarinwa O, Holt N BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):390.

PMID: 37087506 PMC: 10122823. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09410-x.


Bowel cancer knowledge gaps evident among Irish residents: results of a national questionnaire survey.

Flynn L, Fallows S Ir J Med Sci. 2023; 192(5):2085-2093.

PMID: 36656421 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-023-03273-1.


References
1.
Luckmann R, Savageau J, Clemow L, Stoddard A, Costanza M . A randomized trial of telephone counseling to promote screening mammography in two HMOs. Cancer Detect Prev. 2003; 27(6):442-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2003.09.003. View

2.
Meissner H, Breen N, Klabunde C, Vernon S . Patterns of colorectal cancer screening uptake among men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15(2):389-94. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0678. View

3.
van der Aa M, Pukkala E, Coebergh J, Anttila A, Siesling S . Mass screening programmes and trends in cervical cancer in Finland and the Netherlands. Int J Cancer. 2007; 122(8):1854-8. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23276. View

4.
Hoff G, Grotmol T, Skovlund E, Bretthauer M . Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2009; 338:b1846. PMC: 2688666. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b1846. View

5.
Champion V, Skinner C, Hui S, Monahan P, Juliar B, Daggy J . The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence. Patient Educ Couns. 2007; 65(3):416-23. PMC: 1858664. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.09.014. View