» Articles » PMID: 19953085

Discrete Logic Modelling As a Means to Link Protein Signalling Networks with Functional Analysis of Mammalian Signal Transduction

Overview
Journal Mol Syst Biol
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 2009 Dec 3
PMID 19953085
Citations 155
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Large-scale protein signalling networks are useful for exploring complex biochemical pathways but do not reveal how pathways respond to specific stimuli. Such specificity is critical for understanding disease and designing drugs. Here we describe a computational approach--implemented in the free CNO software--for turning signalling networks into logical models and calibrating the models against experimental data. When a literature-derived network of 82 proteins covering the immediate-early responses of human cells to seven cytokines was modelled, we found that training against experimental data dramatically increased predictive power, despite the crudeness of Boolean approximations, while significantly reducing the number of interactions. Thus, many interactions in literature-derived networks do not appear to be functional in the liver cells from which we collected our data. At the same time, CNO identified several new interactions that improved the match of model to data. Although missing from the starting network, these interactions have literature support. Our approach, therefore, represents a means to generate predictive, cell-type-specific models of mammalian signalling from generic protein signalling networks.

Citing Articles

Transcriptomic Evidence Reveals the Dysfunctional Mechanism of Synaptic Plasticity Control in ASD.

Kong C, Bing Z, Yang L, Huang Z, Wang W, Grebogi C Genes (Basel). 2025; 16(1).

PMID: 39858558 PMC: 11764921. DOI: 10.3390/genes16010011.


Systems-level reconstruction of kinase phosphosignaling networks regulating endothelial barrier integrity using temporal data.

Wei L, Aitchison J, Kaushansky A, Mast F NPJ Syst Biol Appl. 2024; 10(1):134.

PMID: 39548089 PMC: 11568298. DOI: 10.1038/s41540-024-00468-9.


Network dynamics-based subtyping of Alzheimer's disease with microglial genetic risk factors.

Choi J, Lee J, Kang U, Chang H, Cho K Alzheimers Res Ther. 2024; 16(1):229.

PMID: 39415193 PMC: 11481771. DOI: 10.1186/s13195-024-01583-9.


LogicGep: Boolean networks inference using symbolic regression from time-series transcriptomic profiling data.

Zhang D, Gao S, Liu Z, Gao R Brief Bioinform. 2024; 25(4).

PMID: 38886006 PMC: 11182660. DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbae286.


Inference of drug off-target effects on cellular signaling using interactome-based deep learning.

Meimetis N, Lauffenburger D, Nilsson A iScience. 2024; 27(4):109509.

PMID: 38591003 PMC: 11000001. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.109509.


References
1.
de Jong H . Modeling and simulation of genetic regulatory systems: a literature review. J Comput Biol. 2002; 9(1):67-103. DOI: 10.1089/10665270252833208. View

2.
Laubenbacher R, Stigler B . A computational algebra approach to the reverse engineering of gene regulatory networks. J Theor Biol. 2004; 229(4):523-37. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2004.04.037. View

3.
Wittmann D, Krumsiek J, Saez-Rodriguez J, Lauffenburger D, Klamt S, Theis F . Transforming Boolean models to continuous models: methodology and application to T-cell receptor signaling. BMC Syst Biol. 2009; 3:98. PMC: 2764636. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-3-98. View

4.
Shmulevich I, Dougherty E, Kim S, Zhang W . Probabilistic Boolean Networks: a rule-based uncertainty model for gene regulatory networks. Bioinformatics. 2002; 18(2):261-74. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.2.261. View

5.
Faure A, Naldi A, Chaouiya C, Thieffry D . Dynamical analysis of a generic Boolean model for the control of the mammalian cell cycle. Bioinformatics. 2006; 22(14):e124-31. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl210. View