» Articles » PMID: 1995038

Anisometropic and Strabismic Amblyopia in the Age Group 2 Years and Above: a Prospective Study of the Results of Treatment

Overview
Journal Br J Ophthalmol
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 1991 Feb 1
PMID 1995038
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty-four children aged 2-9 years with strabismic and anisometropic amblyopia were prospectively followed up during amblyopia treatment. The efficacy of optimised treatment in terms of number of cured children, time to achieve cure, and rate of initial improvement of visual acuity was evaluated in relation to age at start of treatment, type and initial degree of amblyopia, and adherence to treatment regimen. Compliance with treatment was the most critical factor predicting a successful outcome. Among the compliant children 35 out of 36 were cured (visual acuity difference between amblyopic and non-amblyopic eyes not more than one line) within five months regardless of age, treatment regimen, and type or initial degree of amblyopia as compared with none in the group with low compliance. Most of these compliant children were cured within three months, with shorter treatment times on average for the younger children. The initial improvement of visual acuity was also faster at 2 years than at 4 years of age. Anisometropes with moderate amblyopia at the start of treatment were over-represented in the group with low compliance. We conclude that early diagnosis of strabismus in combination with general population screening at the age of 4 to detect amblyopia caused by anisometropia or microstrabismus seems to be efficacious for the cure of most cases. The major factor in treatment failure was found to be inadequate adherence to the treatment regimen.

Citing Articles

The Psychological Impact of Amblyopia Treatment: A Systematic Literature Review.

Haine L, Taylor I, Vaughan M Br Ir Orthopt J. 2025; 21(1):1-14.

PMID: 39831149 PMC: 11740718. DOI: 10.22599/bioj.426.


Pediatric Eye Evaluations Preferred Practice Pattern.

Hutchinson A, Morse C, Hercinovic A, Cruz O, Sprunger D, Repka M Ophthalmology. 2022; 130(3):P222-P270.

PMID: 36543602 PMC: 10680450. DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.10.030.


Fixation instability, astigmatism, and lack of stereopsis as factors impeding recovery of binocular balance in amblyopia following binocular therapy.

Banko E, Barboni M, Marko K, Kortvelyes J, Nemeth J, Zs Nagy Z Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):10311.

PMID: 35725590 PMC: 9209502. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13947-y.


Organic visual loss measured by kinetic perimetry and retinal electrophysiology in children with functional amblyopia.

Beneish R, Dorfman A, Khan A, Polomeno R, Lachapelle P Doc Ophthalmol. 2021; 143(1):1-16.

PMID: 33515394 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-020-09811-x.


Looking beyond occlusion: A novel perspective for amblyopia treatment.

Santhan Gopal K, Jayadev C, Thomas S, Gopal S Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020; 68(11):2462-2465.

PMID: 33120641 PMC: 7774144. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_741_20.


References
1.
Oliver M, NAWRATZKI I . Screening of pre-school children for ocular anomalies. II. Amblyopia. Prevalence and therapeutic results at different ages. Br J Ophthalmol. 1971; 55(7):467-71. PMC: 1208420. DOI: 10.1136/bjo.55.7.467. View

2.
NORDLOW W, JOACHIMSSON S . A screening test for visual acuity in four year old children. Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh). 1962; 40:453-62. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-3768.1962.tb07816.x. View

3.
Kohler L, STIGMAR G . Visual disorders in 7-year-old children with and without previous vision screening. Acta Paediatr Scand. 1978; 67(3):373-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1978.tb16337.x. View

4.
Flynn J, Cassady J . Current trends in amblyopia therapy. Ophthalmology. 1978; 85(5):428-50. DOI: 10.1016/s0161-6420(78)35651-7. View

5.
Hedin A, Nyman K, Derouet B . A modified letter matching chart for testing young children's visual acuity. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 1980; 17(2):114-8. DOI: 10.3928/0191-3913-19800301-13. View