» Articles » PMID: 19948680

Learning Style Preferences and Course Performance in an Undergraduate Physiology Class

Overview
Date 2009 Dec 2
PMID 19948680
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Learning styles may be classified according to the sensory modality that one most prefers to use when internalizing information. The four major sensory modalities are visual, aural or auditory, read/write, and kinesthetic. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preferred learning style, gender, and course scores in an undergraduate physiology class. Students from the fall 2008 and spring 2009 Applied Human Physiology courses completed an online questionnaire in which they were asked to both provide descriptive information about themselves (e.g., gender and major) and self-assess their preferred sensory modality. A total of 901 students completed the questionnaire, 75% of which were female and 25% were male. The results from a chi(2)-analysis (chi(2) = 9.59, P < 0.05) indicated that females and males had significantly different learning style preferences. Females most preferred visual learning (46%) followed by aural (27%), read/write (23%), and kinesthetic (4%). Males most preferred visual learning (49%) followed by read/write (29%), aural (17%), and kinesthetic (5%). There was also a significant relationship (P < 0.05 by ANOVA) between preferred sensory modality and course scores. The mean overall course scores were 83.53 +/- 8.25, 85.58 +/- 8.18, 84.98 +/- 7.78, and 76.70 +/- 7.92 for those that preferred visual, aural, read/write, and kinesthetic modalities, respectively. These results support the findings of Wehrwein et al. (18): that female and male physiology students have different sensory modality preferences and that they provide the first step in determining if sensory modality preferences impact final course scores.

Citing Articles

Exploring the influence of learning modality preferences and COVID-19 infection experiences on depressive mood in Chinese students.

Sun F, Shi W, Wang T, Wang Y Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17375.

PMID: 39075277 PMC: 11286947. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68509-1.


Learning styles and their relationship with preferred teaching methodologies and academic achievement among medical students in teaching medical college, Tamil Nadu.

Muniyapillai T, Kulothungan K, Abdul Malik S, Jeevaraj S, Ashokan S, Ravichandran S J Educ Health Promot. 2023; 12:256.

PMID: 37727436 PMC: 10506770. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_185_23.


Perceptions and Attitudes of Jordanian Medical Students on Using 3D Interactive Anatomy Dissection in Teaching and Learning Anatomy.

Funjan K, Ashour L, Salameh M, Mustafa A, Seed Ahmed M Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023; 14:837-844.

PMID: 37560611 PMC: 10406572. DOI: 10.2147/AMEP.S419333.


How to Work with Electromyography Decomposition in Practical Classes of Exercise Physiology and Biomechanics.

Priego-Quesada J, Goethel M, Becker K, Fernandes R, Vilas-Boas J Life (Basel). 2022; 12(4).

PMID: 35454974 PMC: 9033016. DOI: 10.3390/life12040483.


Enhancing Toxicology Achievement by the VARK and the GRSLSS-mixed Models in Team-Based Learning.

Khamphaya T, Pouyfung P, Yimthiang S Front Public Health. 2022; 9:732550.

PMID: 35118035 PMC: 8804276. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.732550.