» Articles » PMID: 19944173

Topological FDR for Neuroimaging

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Dec 1
PMID 19944173
Citations 206
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this technical note, we describe and validate a topological false discovery rate (FDR) procedure for statistical parametric mapping. This procedure is designed to deal with signal that is continuous and has, in principle, unbounded spatial support. We therefore infer on topological features of the signal, such as the existence of local maxima or peaks above some threshold. Using results from random field theory, we assign a p-value to each maximum in an SPM and identify an adaptive threshold that controls false discovery rate, using the Benjamini and Hochberg (BH) procedure (1995). This provides a natural complement to conventional family wise error (FWE) control on local maxima. We use simulations to contrast these procedures; both in terms of their relative number of discoveries and their spatial accuracy (via the distribution of the Euclidian distance between true and discovered activations). We also assessed two other procedures: cluster-wise and voxel-wise FDR procedures. Our results suggest that (a) FDR control of maxima or peaks is more sensitive than FWE control of peaks with minimal cost in terms of false-positives, (b) voxel-wise FDR is substantially less accurate than topological FWE or FDR control. Finally, we present an illustrative application using an fMRI study of visual attention.

Citing Articles

Brain plasticity associated with prolonged shooting training: a multimodal neuroimaging investigation from a cross-sectional study.

Zhang K, Zhao T, Ding Y, Cheng J, Cao C Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1530642.

PMID: 40012606 PMC: 11860876. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1530642.


Time Dependent Effects of Cerebellar tDCS on Cerebello-cortical Connectivity Networks in Young Adults.

Maldonado T, Jackson T, Rezaee Z, Bernard J Cerebellum. 2025; 24(1):29.

PMID: 39794631 DOI: 10.1007/s12311-024-01781-z.


Functional Connectivity Biomarker Extraction for Schizophrenia Based on Energy Landscape Machine Learning Techniques.

Allen J, Varanasi S, Han F, Hong L, Choa F Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(23).

PMID: 39686279 PMC: 11645077. DOI: 10.3390/s24237742.


Salience Network in Autism: preliminary results on functional connectivity analysis in resting state.

Attanasio M, Mazza M, Le Donne I, Nigri A, Valenti M Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2024; .

PMID: 39673625 DOI: 10.1007/s00406-024-01949-y.


The hidden link: Investigating functional connectivity of rarely explored sub-regions of thalamus and superior temporal gyrus in Schizophrenia.

Alahmadi A, Al-Ghamdi J, Tayeb H Transl Neurosci. 2024; 15(1):20220356.

PMID: 39669226 PMC: 11635424. DOI: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0356.


References
1.
Worsley K, Evans A, Marrett S, Neelin P . A three-dimensional statistical analysis for CBF activation studies in human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1992; 12(6):900-18. DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1992.127. View

2.
Nichols T, Hayasaka S . Controlling the familywise error rate in functional neuroimaging: a comparative review. Stat Methods Med Res. 2003; 12(5):419-46. DOI: 10.1191/0962280203sm341ra. View

3.
Chumbley J, Friston K . False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields. Neuroimage. 2008; 44(1):62-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.05.021. View

4.
Friston K, Worsley K, Frackowiak R, Mazziotta J, Evans A . Assessing the significance of focal activations using their spatial extent. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014; 1(3):210-20. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.460010306. View

5.
Worsley K, Marrett S, Neelin P, Vandal A, Friston K, Evans A . A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation. Hum Brain Mapp. 2010; 4(1):58-73. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1996)4:1<58::AID-HBM4>3.0.CO;2-O. View