» Articles » PMID: 19940165

Role of Striatum in Updating Values of Chosen Actions

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Nov 27
PMID 19940165
Citations 122
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The striatum is thought to play a crucial role in value-based decision making. Although a large body of evidence suggests its involvement in action selection as well as action evaluation, underlying neural processes for these functions of the striatum are largely unknown. To obtain insights on this matter, we simultaneously recorded neuronal activity in the dorsal and ventral striatum of rats performing a dynamic two-armed bandit task, and examined temporal profiles of neural signals related to animal's choice, its outcome, and action value. Whereas significant neural signals for action value were found in both structures before animal's choice of action, signals related to the upcoming choice were relatively weak and began to emerge only in the dorsal striatum approximately 200 ms before the behavioral manifestation of the animal's choice. In contrast, once the animal revealed its choice, signals related to choice and its value increased steeply and persisted until the outcome of animal's choice was revealed, so that some neurons in both structures concurrently conveyed signals related to animal's choice, its outcome, and the value of chosen action. Thus, all the components necessary for updating values of chosen actions were available in the striatum. These results suggest that the striatum not only represents values associated with potential choices before animal's choice of action, but might also update the value of chosen action once its outcome is revealed. In contrast, action selection might take place elsewhere or in the dorsal striatum only immediately before its behavioral manifestation.

Citing Articles

Striatal arbitration between choice strategies guides few-shot adaptation.

Yang M, Jung M, Lee S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1811.

PMID: 39979316 PMC: 11842591. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57049-5.


"PyTDL": A versatile temporal difference learning algorithm to simulate behavior process of decision making and cognitive learning.

Wu Q, Yang X, Wang K, Zhu M, Liang J, Han Y iScience. 2025; 28(1):111600.

PMID: 39834866 PMC: 11743081. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111600.


Hierarchical gradients of multiple timescales in the mammalian forebrain.

Song M, Shin E, Seo H, Soltani A, Steinmetz N, Lee D Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024; 121(51):e2415695121.

PMID: 39671181 PMC: 11665873. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2415695121.


Single-Trial Representations of Decision-Related Variables by Decomposed Frontal Corticostriatal Ensemble Activity.

Handa T, Fukai T, Kurikawa T eNeuro. 2024; 11(8).

PMID: 39054055 PMC: 11302496. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0172-24.2024.


Medial prefrontal cortex suppresses reward-seeking behavior with risk of punishment by reducing sensitivity to reward.

Nishio M, Kondo M, Yoshida E, Matsuzaki M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1412509.

PMID: 38903603 PMC: 11188571. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1412509.


References
1.
Albin R, Young A, Penney J . The functional anatomy of basal ganglia disorders. Trends Neurosci. 1989; 12(10):366-75. DOI: 10.1016/0166-2236(89)90074-x. View

2.
Seamans J, Lapish C, Durstewitz D . Comparing the prefrontal cortex of rats and primates: insights from electrophysiology. Neurotox Res. 2008; 14(2-3):249-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF03033814. View

3.
Baeg E, Kim Y, Huh K, Mook-Jung I, Kim H, Jung M . Dynamics of population code for working memory in the prefrontal cortex. Neuron. 2003; 40(1):177-88. DOI: 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00597-x. View

4.
Nicola S, Yun I, Wakabayashi K, Fields H . Cue-evoked firing of nucleus accumbens neurons encodes motivational significance during a discriminative stimulus task. J Neurophysiol. 2003; 91(4):1840-65. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00657.2003. View

5.
Berridge K . The debate over dopamine's role in reward: the case for incentive salience. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006; 191(3):391-431. DOI: 10.1007/s00213-006-0578-x. View