» Articles » PMID: 19936732

Magnetic Resonance Plaque Imaging to Predict the Occurrence of the Slow-flow Phenomenon in Carotid Artery Stenting Procedures

Overview
Journal Neuroradiology
Specialties Neurology
Radiology
Date 2009 Nov 26
PMID 19936732
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The purpose is to investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) plaque imaging in predicting the arterial flow impairment (slow-flow phenomenon) during carotid artery stenting (CAS) using a filter-type protection device.

Methods: Thirty-one carotid artery stenotic lesions in 30 patients (28 men and two women; mean age, 71.8 years) were evaluated by MR plaque imaging with black blood T1- and T2-weighted and time-of-flight sequences before CAS. Main plaque components were classified as vulnerable (intraplaque hemorrhage and lipid-rich/necrotic core) or stable (fibrous tissue and dense calcification) from the signal pattern. The plaque classification was statistically compared with the occurrence of slow-flow phenomenon.

Results: The slow-flow phenomenon was observed in ten CAS procedures (five flow arrests and five flow reductions). Flow arrests consisted of four vulnerable and one stable plaque, and flow reductions consisted of four vulnerable and one stable plaque. The slow-flow phenomenon occurred significantly (P<0.01) more frequently in patients with vulnerable plaque.

Conclusions: Vulnerable carotid plaques have a significantly higher risk of slow-flow phenomenon than stable plaques. The occurrence of the slow-flow phenomenon can be predicted by MR plaque imaging before CAS.

Citing Articles

Forearm access for carotid artery stenting using the dual protection of flow reversal and distal filter: Trans-forearm dual protection technique.

Hanaoka Y, Koyama J, Kubota Y, Nakamura T, Kitamura S, Yamazaki D Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199241270903.

PMID: 39166282 PMC: 11571155. DOI: 10.1177/15910199241270903.


Flow arrest during carotid artery stenting with a distal embolic protection device: A single-center experience and clinical implications.

Hong N, Park J, Kim S, Son Y J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. 2024; 26(2):163-173.

PMID: 38403575 PMC: 11220293. DOI: 10.7461/jcen.2024.E2023.10.001.


Sex Differences in Carotid Atherosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

van Dam-Nolen D, van Egmond N, Koudstaal P, van der Lugt A, Bos D Stroke. 2022; 54(2):315-326.

PMID: 36444718 PMC: 9855762. DOI: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.041046.


Blocked Filter of Anti-Embolic Device During Carotid Artery Stenting: A Rare Occurrence Posing Challenging Diagnostic Dilemma.

Mishra S, Singh V, Gupta A, Sharma S, Tyagi L Cureus. 2021; 13(11):e19219.

PMID: 34873545 PMC: 8639398. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.19219.


Lipid Core Plaque Distribution Using Near-infrared Spectroscopy Is Consistent with Pathological Evaluation in Carotid Artery Plaques.

Kotsugi M, Nakagawa I, Hatakeyama K, Park H, Sato F, Furuta T Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2020; 60(10):499-506.

PMID: 32879184 PMC: 7555160. DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2020-0154.


References
1.
Mofidi R, Crotty T, McCarthy P, Sheehan S, Mehigan D, Keaveny T . Association between plaque instability, angiogenesis and symptomatic carotid occlusive disease. Br J Surg. 2001; 88(7):945-50. DOI: 10.1046/j.0007-1323.2001.01823.x. View

2.
Katzen B, Criado F, Ramee S, Massop D, Hopkins L, Donohoe D . Carotid artery stenting with emboli protection surveillance study: thirty-day results of the CASES-PMS study. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2007; 70(2):316-23. DOI: 10.1002/ccd.21222. View

3.
Jeziorska M, Woolley D . Local neovascularization and cellular composition within vulnerable regions of atherosclerotic plaques of human carotid arteries. J Pathol. 1999; 188(2):189-96. DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199906)188:2<189::AID-PATH336>3.0.CO;2-N. View

4.
Kastrup A, Groschel K, Nagele T, Riecker A, Schmidt F, Schnaudigel S . Effects of age and symptom status on silent ischemic lesions after carotid stenting with and without the use of distal filter devices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007; 29(3):608-12. PMC: 8118866. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0871. View

5.
Siewiorek G, Wholey M, Finol E . In vitro performance assessment of distal protection devices for carotid artery stenting: effect of physiological anatomy on vascular resistance. J Endovasc Ther. 2007; 14(5):712-24. DOI: 10.1177/152660280701400517. View