A Randomised Controlled Comparison of Early Post-pyloric Versus Early Gastric Feeding to Meet Nutritional Targets in Ventilated Intensive Care Patients
Overview
Affiliations
Introduction: To compare outcomes from early post-pyloric to gastric feeding in ventilated, critically ill patients in a medical intensive care unit (ICU).
Methods: Prospective randomized study. Ventilated patients were randomly assigned to receive enteral feed via a nasogastric or a post-pyloric tube. Post-pyloric tubes were inserted by the bedside nurse and placement was confirmed radiographically.
Results: A total of 104 patients were enrolled, 54 in the gastric group and 50 in the post-pyloric group. Bedside post-pyloric tube insertion was successful in 80% of patients. Patients who failed post-pyloric insertion were fed via the nasogastric route, but were analysed on an intent-to treat basis. A per protocol analysis was also performed. Baseline characteristics were similar for all except Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) score, which was higher in the post-pyloric group. There was no difference in length of stay or ventilator days. The gastric group was quicker to initiate feed 4.3 hours (2.9 - 6.5 hours) as compared to post-pyloric group 6.6 hours (4.5 - 13.0 hours) (P = 0.0002). The time to reach target feeds from admission was also faster in gastric group: 8.7 hours (7.6 - 13.0 hours) compared to 12.3 hours (8.9 - 17.5 hours). The average daily energy and protein deficit were lower in gastric group 73 Kcal (2 - 288 Kcal) and 3.5 g (0 - 15 g) compared to 167 Kcal (70 - 411 Kcal) and 6.5 g (2.8 - 17.3 g) respectively but was only statistically significant for the average energy deficit (P = 0.035). This difference disappeared in the per protocol analysis. Complication rates were similar.
Conclusions: Early post-pyloric feeding offers no advantage over early gastric feeding in terms of overall nutrition received and complications
Trial Registration:
Clinical Trial: anzctr.org.au:ACTRN12606000367549.
Liu C, Jiang J, Wen Z, You T Syst Rev. 2025; 14(1):13.
PMID: 39810188 PMC: 11734493. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02743-6.
Yong A, Li X, Peng L, Cheng S, Qiu W Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2024; 19(2):168-177.
PMID: 38973791 PMC: 11223552. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2024.139473.
Li L, Huang J Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2024; 33(3):283-297.
PMID: 38965718 PMC: 11389815. DOI: 10.6133/apjcn.202409_33(3).0001.
Chen W, Peng M, Ye Z, Ai Y, Liu Z Front Med (Lausanne). 2024; 11:1321599.
PMID: 38384419 PMC: 10879295. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1321599.
Yu T, Cai F, Jiang R Front Med (Lausanne). 2022; 9:823067.
PMID: 35755035 PMC: 9218181. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.823067.