» Articles » PMID: 19924722

Advanced Gastric Cancer in the Middle One-third of the Stomach: Should Surgeons Perform Total Gastrectomy?

Overview
Journal J Surg Oncol
Date 2009 Nov 20
PMID 19924722
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: To determine which optimal surgical procedure for middle-third advanced gastric cancer (AGC) based on comparative study of the long-term prognosis between total gastrectomy (TG) and distal gastrectomy (DG).

Methods: Between March 1993 and December 2005, 402 patients with middle-third AGC who underwent gastric resection were enrolled in this study. We analyzed the long-term prognosis according to the length of the proximal resection margin (PRM) and the extent of gastric resection, and determined independent prognostic factors.

Results: TG was performed in 244 patients (60.7%) and DG was performed in 158 patients (39.3%). There were no significant differences in the 5-year survival rates according to the length of PRM. The 5-year survival rates of patients who underwent DG were significantly higher than the rates of the patients who underwent TG in curative cases (67.8% vs. 58.4%, P = 0.037). Nevertheless, there was no significant difference in the stage-stratified survival rates according to the extent of gastric resection. Multivariate analysis revealed that surgical curability, extent of lymphadenectomy, and stage were independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion: If curative resection can be performed, the long-term prognosis of patients with middle-third AGC was not affected by the length of PRM or the extent of gastric resection.

Citing Articles

Prognostic Relevance of the Proximal Resection Margin Distance in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Adenocarcinoma.

Rompen I, Schutte I, Crnovrsanin N, Schiefer S, Billeter A, Haag G Ann Surg Oncol. 2024; 31(10):6900-6908.

PMID: 38969858 PMC: 11413044. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-15721-y.


Adequate gross resection margin length ensuring pathologically complete resection in gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hayami M, Ohashi M, Kurihara N, Nunobe S Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2024; 8(2):202-213.

PMID: 38455483 PMC: 10914694. DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12761.


Oncological Impact of Gross Proximal Margin Length in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Is the Japanese Recommendation Valid?.

Hayami M, Ohashi M, Ishizuka N, Hiki N, Kumagai K, Ida S Ann Surg Open. 2023; 2(1):e036.

PMID: 37638234 PMC: 10455052. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000036.


A "Just Enough" Gross Proximal Margin Length Ensuring Pathologically Complete Resection in Distal Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

Hayami M, Ohashi M, Ida S, Kumagai K, Sano T, Hiki N Ann Surg Open. 2023; 1(2):e026.

PMID: 37637443 PMC: 10455132. DOI: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000026.


A systematic review of minimal length of lroximal margin in gastric adenocarcinoma resection.

Mariani A, Zaanan A, Rebibo L, Martin G, Taieb J, Karoui M Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023; 408(1):172.

PMID: 37133626 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02910-8.