» Articles » PMID: 19924214

Frequency of Gamma Oscillations Routes Flow of Information in the Hippocampus

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Nov 20
PMID 19924214
Citations 668
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Gamma oscillations are thought to transiently link distributed cell assemblies that are processing related information, a function that is probably important for network processes such as perception, attentional selection and memory. This 'binding' mechanism requires that spatially distributed cells fire together with millisecond range precision; however, it is not clear how such coordinated timing is achieved given that the frequency of gamma oscillations varies substantially across space and time, from approximately 25 to almost 150 Hz. Here we show that gamma oscillations in the CA1 area of the hippocampus split into distinct fast and slow frequency components that differentially couple CA1 to inputs from the medial entorhinal cortex, an area that provides information about the animal's current position, and CA3, a hippocampal subfield essential for storage of such information. Fast gamma oscillations in CA1 were synchronized with fast gamma in medial entorhinal cortex, and slow gamma oscillations in CA1 were coherent with slow gamma in CA3. Significant proportions of cells in medial entorhinal cortex and CA3 were phase-locked to fast and slow CA1 gamma waves, respectively. The two types of gamma occurred at different phases of the CA1 theta rhythm and mostly on different theta cycles. These results point to routeing of information as a possible function of gamma frequency variations in the brain and provide a mechanism for temporal segregation of potentially interfering information from different sources.

Citing Articles

Functional segregation of rostral and caudal hippocampus in associative memory.

Vorobiova A, Feurra M, Pavone E, Stieglitz L, Imbach L, Moiseeva V Front Hum Neurosci. 2025; 19:1509163.

PMID: 39996022 PMC: 11848949. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1509163.


Distinct disruptions in CA1 and CA3 place cell function in Alzheimer's disease mice.

Park S, Park M, Kim E, Kim J, Cho J, Huh Y iScience. 2025; 28(2):111631.

PMID: 39911347 PMC: 11795144. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.111631.


Cortical and subcortical activities during food rewards versus social interaction in rats.

Rocha-Almeida F, Conde-Moro A, Fernandez-Ruiz A, Delgado-Garcia J, Gruart A Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4389.

PMID: 39910316 PMC: 11799384. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87880-1.


Growth Hormone Alters Remapping in the Hippocampal Area CA1 in a Novel Environment.

Haugland K, Jordbraek S, Knutsen E, Kjelstrup K, Brun V eNeuro. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 39900507 PMC: 11814925. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0237-24.2024.


Medial entorhinal-hippocampal desynchronization parallels the emergence of memory impairment in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Vetere L, Galas A, Vaughan N, Feng Y, Christenson Wick Z, Philipsberg P bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39868201 PMC: 11761809. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.15.633171.


References
1.
Senior T, Huxter J, Allen K, ONeill J, Csicsvari J . Gamma oscillatory firing reveals distinct populations of pyramidal cells in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 2008; 28(9):2274-86. PMC: 6671861. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4669-07.2008. View

2.
Mehta M, Barnes C, McNaughton B . Experience-dependent, asymmetric expansion of hippocampal place fields. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997; 94(16):8918-21. PMC: 23195. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8918. View

3.
Montgomery S, Buzsaki G . Gamma oscillations dynamically couple hippocampal CA3 and CA1 regions during memory task performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007; 104(36):14495-500. PMC: 1964875. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0701826104. View

4.
Fyhn M, Molden S, Witter M, Moser E, Moser M . Spatial representation in the entorhinal cortex. Science. 2004; 305(5688):1258-64. DOI: 10.1126/science.1099901. View

5.
Brun V, Leutgeb S, Wu H, Schwarcz R, Witter M, Moser E . Impaired spatial representation in CA1 after lesion of direct input from entorhinal cortex. Neuron. 2008; 57(2):290-302. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.11.034. View