» Articles » PMID: 19920981

Retaining the Patient Perspective in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Set for Low Back Pain

Overview
Date 2009 Nov 19
PMID 19920981
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between health problems as rated by the health professionals in the Norwegian form of the Core Set for low back pain and the patients' self-reported health problems in Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II).

Methods: This was part of an international multicenter study where a convenience sample of 118 Norwegian patients with low back pain (LBP) participated. The ICF Core Set for LBP was filled in by the health professionals. The patients reported their health problems in the WHODAS II and ODI. The items in WHODAS II and ODI were linked to the ICF. The problems reported in WHODAS II and ODI were compared to the problems scored by the health professionals in the linked ICF categories in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for LBP.

Results: All items in ODI could be linked the ICF. Four items in WHODAS II could not be linked to the ICF and additionally two items could not be linked to specific ICF categories. All ICF categories linked to the ODI were included in the Comprehensive Core Set for LBP, whereas six items in WHODAS II could not be linked, and additionally 11 of the items were not represented in the Core Set. With the exception of sexual function, above three quarter of the patients' reported problems within body functions was captured by the health professionals. Within several of the activities and participation categories the health professionals scores in the ICF reflected the patients' reported problems well. Surprisingly some of the problems in activities of daily living were poorly reflected.

Conclusion: The Comprehensive ICF Core Set for LBP covers most of the items in ODI and WHODAS II in areas where patients report significant problems, with some exceptions. The subjective dimension related to the impact of the health condition as well as the feeling of being a burden to their family appeared to be important to these patients and not covered in the ICF. Problems with sexual functions and relationship were poorly reflected in the health professionals' scores in the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for LBP. In clinical practice it is a challenge to assess the individual patients' broad spectrum of problems precisely.

Citing Articles

Functioning in an Illness and Quality of Life versus the Prevalence of Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Patients with High Cardiovascular Risk.

Michalski P, Kosobucka-Ozdoba A, Pietrzykowski L, Kasprzak M, Grzelakowska K, Rzepka-Cholasinska A Nurs Rep. 2024; 14(3):2596-2604.

PMID: 39330745 PMC: 11434633. DOI: 10.3390/nursrep14030191.


The occurrence of cardiovascular risk factors and functioning in chronic illness in the Polish population of EUROASPIRE V.

Kubica A, Pietrzykowski L, Michalski P, Kasprzak M, Ratajczak J, Siodmiak J Cardiol J. 2022; 31(4):612-620.

PMID: 36385605 PMC: 11374325. DOI: 10.5603/CJ.a2022.0102.


A comparison between WHODAS 2.0 and Modified Barthel Index: which tool is more suitable for assessing the disability and the recovery rate in orthopedic rehabilitation?.

Galli T, Mirata P, Foglia E, Croce D, Porazzi E, Ferrario L Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2018; 10:301-307.

PMID: 29892201 PMC: 5993025. DOI: 10.2147/CEOR.S150526.


Development of the Global Disability Scale (Glo.Di.S): preliminary results.

Fountoulakis K, Lekka E, Kouidi E, Chouvarda I, Deligiannis A, Maglaveras N Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2012; 11(1):14.

PMID: 22594786 PMC: 3434028. DOI: 10.1186/1744-859X-11-14.


A validity-driven approach to the understanding of the personal and societal burden of low back pain: development of a conceptual and measurement model.

Buchbinder R, Batterham R, Elsworth G, Dionne C, Irvin E, Osborne R Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13(5):R152.

PMID: 21933393 PMC: 3308082. DOI: 10.1186/ar3468.

References
1.
Daltroy L, Katz J, Fossel A, Liang M . The North American spine society lumbar spine outcome assessment Instrument: reliability and validity tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996; 21(6):741-9. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199603150-00017. View

2.
Mullis R, Barber J, Lewis M, Hay E . ICF core sets for low back pain: do they include what matters to patients?. J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39(5):353-7. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0059. View

3.
Jamison R, Sbrocco T, Parris W . The influence of problems with concentration and memory on emotional distress and daily activities in chronic pain patients. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1988; 18(2):183-91. DOI: 10.2190/ftr1-f9vx-cb8t-wpmc. View

4.
Grotle M, Vollestad N, Brox J . Clinical course and impact of fear-avoidance beliefs in low back pain: prospective cohort study of acute and chronic low back pain: II. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006; 31(9):1038-46. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000214878.01709.0e. View

5.
Parkin T, Skinner T . Discrepancies between patient and professionals recall and perception of an outpatient consultation. Diabet Med. 2003; 20(11):909-14. DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.01056.x. View