» Articles » PMID: 19920198

Intrinsic Gene Expression Profiles of Gliomas Are a Better Predictor of Survival Than Histology

Abstract

Gliomas are the most common primary brain tumors with heterogeneous morphology and variable prognosis. Treatment decisions in patients rely mainly on histologic classification and clinical parameters. However, differences between histologic subclasses and grades are subtle, and classifying gliomas is subject to a large interobserver variability. To improve current classification standards, we have performed gene expression profiling on a large cohort of glioma samples of all histologic subtypes and grades. We identified seven distinct molecular subgroups that correlate with survival. These include two favorable prognostic subgroups (median survival, >4.7 years), two with intermediate prognosis (median survival, 1-4 years), two with poor prognosis (median survival, <1 year), and one control group. The intrinsic molecular subtypes of glioma are different from histologic subgroups and correlate better to patient survival. The prognostic value of molecular subgroups was validated on five independent sample cohorts (The Cancer Genome Atlas, Repository for Molecular Brain Neoplasia Data, GSE12907, GSE4271, and Li and colleagues). The power of intrinsic subtyping is shown by its ability to identify a subset of prognostically favorable tumors within an external data set that contains only histologically confirmed glioblastomas (GBM). Specific genetic changes (epidermal growth factor receptor amplification, IDH1 mutation, and 1p/19q loss of heterozygosity) segregate in distinct molecular subgroups. We identified a subgroup with molecular features associated with secondary GBM, suggesting that different genetic changes drive gene expression profiles. Finally, we assessed response to treatment in molecular subgroups. Our data provide compelling evidence that expression profiling is a more accurate and objective method to classify gliomas than histologic classification. Molecular classification therefore may aid diagnosis and can guide clinical decision making.

Citing Articles

Establishment and validation of a prognostic prediction model for glioma based on key genes and clinical factors.

Lin Y, Li H, Ge Q, Hua D Transl Cancer Res. 2025; 14(1):240-253.

PMID: 39974385 PMC: 11833365. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-24-1035.


Robust Cluster Prediction Across Data Types Validates Association of Sex and Therapy Response in GBM.

Gibbs D, Cioffi G, Aguilar B, Waite K, Pan E, Mandel J Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941811 PMC: 11815886. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030445.


Rapid Natural Killer Cell Gene Responses, Generated by TLR Ligand-Induced Trained Immunity, Provide Protection to Bacterial Infection in Mutant Zebrafish ().

Muire P, Hanson L, Petrie-Hanson L Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(3).

PMID: 39940731 PMC: 11818001. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26030962.


Integrative analysis of SEPN1 in glioma: Prognostic roles, functional implications, and potential therapeutic interventions.

Wang Z, Wang D, Wang X, Xu Y, Yuan Y, Chen Y PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318501.

PMID: 39919065 PMC: 11805447. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318501.


Revisiting ABC Transporters and Their Clinical Significance in Glioblastoma.

Phon B, Chelliah S, Osman D, Bhuvanendran S, Radhakrishnan A, Kamarudin M Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025; 18(1).

PMID: 39861164 PMC: 11769420. DOI: 10.3390/ph18010102.