» Articles » PMID: 19914220

Changes in Familiarity and Recollection Across the Lifespan: an ERP Perspective

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Nov 17
PMID 19914220
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The ability to recognize previous experience depends on two neurocognitive processes, familiarity, fast-acting and relatively automatic, and recollection, slower-acting and more effortful. Familiarity appears to mature relatively early in development and is maintained with aging, whereas recollection shows protracted development and deteriorates with aging. To assess this model, ERP and behavioral data were recorded in children (9-10 years), adolescents (13-14), young (20-30) and older (65-85) adults during a recognition memory task in which the same items were studied and tested over four cycles. Participants decided whether each item was old or new and then whether the decision was associated with (Remember, R) or without (Know, K) contextual detail. Memory sensitivity was greatest in young adults, although all groups showed increases in memory sensitivity and R judgments with repetition. Familiarity-based processes (mid-frontal episodic memory, EM, effect) appeared to be used by adolescents, young and older adults, but apparently not to the same extent by children. Recollection-based processes (parietal EM effect) were recruited by children, adolescents and young adults, but to a much lesser extent by older adults. Repetition enhanced the parietal effect in all but older adults. However, post-hoc analyses indicated that reduced recollective processing was confined to poor-performing older adults. By contrast, children appeared to rely mainly on recollection concordant with their conservative decision criteria across tests. We conclude that episodic-memory development reflects the increasingly flexible and interchangeable use of familiarity and recollection with a breakdown in the latter at older ages, perhaps limited to poor-performing older adults.

Citing Articles

Brain correlates of declarative memory atypicalities in autism: a systematic review of functional neuroimaging findings.

Desaunay P, Guillery B, Moussaoui E, Eustache F, Bowler D, Guenole F Mol Autism. 2023; 14(1):2.

PMID: 36627713 PMC: 9832704. DOI: 10.1186/s13229-022-00525-2.


How does episodic memory develop in adolescence?.

Mechie I, Plaisted-Grant K, Cheke L Learn Mem. 2021; 28(6):204-217.

PMID: 34011517 PMC: 8139634. DOI: 10.1101/lm.053264.120.


Part-List Cues Hinder Familiarity but Not Recollection in Item Recognition: Behavioral and Event-Related Potential Evidence.

Liu T, Xing M, Bai X Front Psychol. 2020; 11:561899.

PMID: 33132967 PMC: 7564720. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561899.


Age- and performance-related differences in source memory retrieval during early childhood: Insights from event-related potentials.

Canada K, Geng F, Riggins T Dev Psychobiol. 2019; 62(6):723-736.

PMID: 31876294 PMC: 7505688. DOI: 10.1002/dev.21946.


Aging and recognition memory: A meta-analysis.

Fraundorf S, Hourihan K, Peters R, Benjamin A Psychol Bull. 2019; 145(4):339-371.

PMID: 30640498 PMC: 6481640. DOI: 10.1037/bul0000185.


References
1.
Duarte A, Ranganath C, Trujillo C, Knight R . Intact recollection memory in high-performing older adults: ERP and behavioral evidence. J Cogn Neurosci. 2006; 18(1):33-47. DOI: 10.1162/089892906775249988. View

2.
Duarte A, Graham K, Henson R . Age-related changes in neural activity associated with familiarity, recollection and false recognition. Neurobiol Aging. 2008; 31(10):1814-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.09.014. View

3.
Czernochowski D, Mecklinger A, Johansson M . Age-related changes in the control of episodic retrieval: an ERP study of recognition memory in children and adults. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(6):1026-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00841.x. View

4.
Duverne S, Motamedinia S, Rugg M . The relationship between aging, performance, and the neural correlates of successful memory encoding. Cereb Cortex. 2008; 19(3):733-44. PMC: 2637304. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn122. View

5.
Stenberg G, Hellman J, Johansson M, Rosen I . Familiarity or conceptual priming: event-related potentials in name recognition. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 21(3):447-60. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21045. View