» Articles » PMID: 19906874

Spatial and Temporal Features of Synaptic to Discharge Receptive Field Transformation in Cat Area 17

Overview
Journal J Neurophysiol
Specialties Neurology
Physiology
Date 2009 Nov 13
PMID 19906874
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to characterize the spatial and temporal features of synaptic and discharge receptive fields (RFs), and to quantify their relationships, in cat area 17. For this purpose, neurons were recorded intracellularly while high-frequency flashing bars were used to generate RFs maps for synaptic and spiking responses. Comparison of the maps shows that some features of the discharge RFs depended strongly on those of the synaptic RFs, whereas others were less dependent. Spiking RF duration depended poorly and spiking RF amplitude depended moderately on those of the underlying synaptic RFs. At the other extreme, the optimal spatial frequency and phase of the discharge RFs in simple cells were almost entirely inherited from those of the synaptic RFs. Subfield width, in both simple and complex cells, was less for spiking responses compared with synaptic responses, but synaptic to discharge width ratio was relatively variable from cell to cell. When considering the whole RF of simple cells, additional variability in width ratio resulted from the presence of additional synaptic subfields that remained subthreshold. Due to these additional, subthreshold subfields, spatial frequency tuning predicted from synaptic RFs appears sharper than that predicted from spiking RFs. Excitatory subfield overlap in spiking RFs was well predicted by subfield overlap at the synaptic level. When examined in different regions of the RF, latencies appeared to be quite variable, but this variability showed negligible dependence on distance from the RF center. Nevertheless, spiking response latency faithfully reflected synaptic response latency.

Citing Articles

Multisensory integration in neurons of the medial pulvinar of macaque monkey.

Vittek A, Juan C, Nowak L, Girard P, Cappe C Cereb Cortex. 2022; 33(8):4202-4215.

PMID: 36068947 PMC: 10110443. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhac337.


The mechanism of orientation selectivity in primary visual cortex without a functional map.

Hansel D, van Vreeswijk C J Neurosci. 2012; 32(12):4049-64.

PMID: 22442071 PMC: 6621225. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6284-11.2012.


The relationship between voltage-sensitive dye imaging signals and spiking activity of neural populations in primate V1.

Chen Y, Palmer C, Seidemann E J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107(12):3281-95.

PMID: 22422999 PMC: 3378408. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00977.2011.


The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Mohanty D, Scholl B, Priebe N J Neurophysiol. 2012; 107(8):2143-53.

PMID: 22279194 PMC: 3331607. DOI: 10.1152/jn.01176.2011.


Inhibition to excitation ratio regulates visual system responses and behavior in vivo.

Shen W, McKeown C, Demas J, Cline H J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106(5):2285-302.

PMID: 21795628 PMC: 3214097. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00641.2011.


References
1.
Worgotter F, Suder K, Zhao Y, Kerscher N, Eysel U, Funke K . State-dependent receptive-field restructuring in the visual cortex. Nature. 1998; 396(6707):165-8. DOI: 10.1038/24157. View

2.
Tanaka K . Cross-correlation analysis of geniculostriate neuronal relationships in cats. J Neurophysiol. 1983; 49(6):1303-18. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1983.49.6.1303. View

3.
Hawken M, Parker A . Spatial properties of neurons in the monkey striate cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1987; 231(1263):251-88. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1987.0044. View

4.
Minke B, Auerbach E . Latencies and correlation in single units and visual evoked potentials in the cat striate cortex following monocular and binocular stimulations. Exp Brain Res. 1972; 14(4):409-22. DOI: 10.1007/BF00235036. View

5.
DeAngelis G, Ohzawa I, Freeman R . Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation. J Neurophysiol. 1993; 69(4):1118-35. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1993.69.4.1118. View