» Articles » PMID: 19902243

Sex-related Differences in Sweat Gland Cholinergic Sensitivity Exist Irrespective of Differences in Aerobic Capacity

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2009 Nov 11
PMID 19902243
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Mechanisms accounting for sex-related differences in the sweat response remain to be elucidated. In the present study, we focused on differences in sweat gland cholinergic sensitivity between males and females. Since, males usually possess higher aerobic capacity than females, we investigated sweating in males and females grouped according to aerobic capacity (.VO(2peak)). Forty-four subjects were assigned to four groups: males with higher (MH) and lower (ML), and females with higher (FH) and lower (FL) .VO(2peak). Forearm sweating was induced by iontophoretic administration (1.5 mA, 60 muA cm(-2), 5 min) of pure water or varying concentrations of pilocarpine hydrochloride (0.125, 0.250, 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0%). Local sweat rate (absorbent paper) and the number of activated sweat glands (iodine impregnated paper) were computed. Maximal pilocarpine-induced sweat rate (SR(max)) and the pilocarpine concentration which elicited 50% of maximal sweating response (K (m)) were calculated. Sweat rate and active gland density increased in response to greater doses of pilocarpine (p < 0.05). Inter-group differences were evident: SR(max) was greatest for MH and lowest for FL (p < 0.05), but no significant differences were observed between ML and FH (p = 0.24). Higher SR(max) were observed, within-sex, for those with greater aerobic capacity (p < 0.05). Furthermore, males' K (m) values were higher than females', indicating greater sweat gland affinity for pilocarpine even for groups having similar aerobic capacity (p < 0.05). In summary, we confirmed that the human sudomotor response is affected by aerobic capacity but, also, that sex-related differences in sweat gland cholinergic sensitivity exist and are not necessarily associated with the typical differences in .VO(2peak) observed between sexes.

Citing Articles

Effects of individual characteristics and local body functions on sweating response: A review.

Niu Z, Goto T Int J Biometeorol. 2024; 68(11):2185-2204.

PMID: 39141136 PMC: 11519300. DOI: 10.1007/s00484-024-02758-7.


A century of exercise physiology: concepts that ignited the study of human thermoregulation. Part 2: physiological measurements.

Notley S, Mitchell D, Taylor N Eur J Appl Physiol. 2023; 123(12):2587-2685.

PMID: 37796291 DOI: 10.1007/s00421-023-05284-3.


Implications of the Onset of Sweating on the Sweat Lactate Threshold.

Maeda Y, Okawara H, Sawada T, Nakashima D, Nagahara J, Fujitsuka H Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(7).

PMID: 37050438 PMC: 10098635. DOI: 10.3390/s23073378.


Measurement of thermal sweating at rest and steady-state exercise in healthy adults: Inter-day reliability and relationships with components of partitional calorimetry.

Peel J, McNarry M, Heffernan S, Nevola V, Kilduff L, Waldron M PLoS One. 2022; 17(12):e0278652.

PMID: 36455061 PMC: 9714830. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278652.


β-adrenergic sweat test in children with inconclusive cystic fibrosis diagnosis: Do we need new reference ranges?.

Zampoli M, Verstraete J, Nguyen-Khoa T, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Zar H, Gonska T Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022; 58(1):187-196.

PMID: 36193559 PMC: 10092537. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26179.


References
1.
Fox R, LOFSTEDT B, Woodward P, Eriksson E, Werkstrom B . Comparison of thermoregulatory function in men and women. J Appl Physiol. 1969; 26(4):444-53. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1969.26.4.444. View

2.
Patterson M, Stocks J, Taylor N . Humid heat acclimation does not elicit a preferential sweat redistribution toward the limbs. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003; 286(3):R512-8. DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00359.2003. View

3.
Frye A, KAMON E . Sweating efficiency in acclimated men and women exercising in humid and dry heat. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1983; 54(4):972-7. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1983.54.4.972. View

4.
Garcia A, Lacerda M, Fonseca I, Reis F, Rodrigues L, Silami-Garcia E . Luteal phase of the menstrual cycle increases sweating rate during exercise. Braz J Med Biol Res. 2006; 39(9):1255-61. DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2006005000007. View

5.
Inoue Y, Havenith G, Kenney W, Loomis J, Buskirk E . Exercise- and methylcholine-induced sweating responses in older and younger men: effect of heat acclimation and aerobic fitness. Int J Biometeorol. 1999; 42(4):210-6. DOI: 10.1007/s004840050107. View