» Articles » PMID: 19898644

Randomized Study to Compare Valsartan +/- HCTZ Versus Amlodipine +/- HCTZ Strategies to Maximize Blood Pressure Control

Overview
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Date 2009 Nov 10
PMID 19898644
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Delays in achieving blood pressure (BP) control may increase morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension. Thus, deciding which antihypertensive agent to use and at what dosage, in addition to determining when to initiate combination therapy and which agents to combine, is important for achieving BP control.

Methods: This randomized, double-blind, 14-week study was conducted to compare the efficacy and tolerability of various doses of valsartan +/- hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) versus amlodipine +/- HCTZ for maximizing BP control in 1,285 patients with uncontrolled hypertension. Patients with stage 1 hypertension and naïve to antihypertensive therapy (33.9%) started valsartan 160 mg or amlodipine 5 mg. Treatment-naïve patients with stage 2 hypertension (13.5%) or those uncontrolled on current antihypertensive monotherapy (52.6%) started valsartan 160 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg. At weeks 4, 8, and 11, patients not achieving BP control were up-titrated (maximum: valsartan 320 mg/HCTZ 25 mg, amlodipine 10 mg/HCTZ 25 mg).

Results: At study end, 78.8% of patients on valsartan +/- HCTZ were controlled (BP <140/90 mmHg) and still on study medication versus 67.8% on amlodipine +/- HCTZ (P < 0.0001). Amlodipine-treated patients had a higher incidence of peripheral edema (22.4% vs 2.2%) and associated discontinuations (7.3% vs <1%). Initiating therapy earlier with valsartan/HCTZ, rather than titrating monotherapy to its maximum dose before adding a second agent, was superior to amlodipine monotherapy or amlodipine +/- HCTZ for achieving BP control, and avoided excessive treatment adjustments and maintained tolerability.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy of irbesartan/ hydrochlorothiazide and valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination in lowering blood pressure: a retrospective observational study in Oman.

Al Balushi K, Habib J, Al-Zakwani I Med Princ Pract. 2012; 22(3):265-9.

PMID: 23235349 PMC: 5586736. DOI: 10.1159/000345389.


Office and ambulatory blood pressure-lowering effects of combination valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide vs. hydrochlorothiazide-based therapy in obese, hypertensive patients.

Raij L, Egan B, Zappe D, Purkayastha D, Samuel R, Sowers J J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2011; 13(10):731-8.

PMID: 21974760 PMC: 8108811. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00499.x.


Pharmaceutical composition of hydrochlorothiazide:β-cyclo-dextrin: preparation by three different methods, physico-chemical characterization and in vivo diuretic activity evaluation.

Pires M, Dos Santos R, Sinisterra R Molecules. 2011; 16(6):4482-99.

PMID: 21623317 PMC: 6264165. DOI: 10.3390/molecules16064482.

References
1.
Osterloh I . The safety of amlodipine. Am Heart J. 1989; 118(5 Pt 2):1114-9; discussion 1119-20. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90838-7. View

2.
Oparil S, Yarows S, Patel S, Fang H, Zhang J, Satlin A . Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double-blind trial. Lancet. 2007; 370(9583):221-229. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61124-6. View

3.
Wagstaff A . Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use in the management of hypertension. Drugs. 2006; 66(14):1881-901. DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200666140-00011. View

4.
Elliott W . What factors contribute to the inadequate control of elevated blood pressure?. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008; 10(1 Suppl 1):20-6. PMC: 8110129. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2007.08028.x. View

5.
Nickenig G, Ostergren J, Struijker-Boudier H . Clinical evidence for the cardiovascular benefits of angiotensin receptor blockers. J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2006; 7 Suppl 1:S1-7. DOI: 10.3317/jraas.2006.017. View