» Articles » PMID: 19888327

Bub3 is a Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein Regulating Chromosome Segregation During Mouse Oocyte Meiosis

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2009 Nov 6
PMID 19888327
Citations 49
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In mitosis, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) prevents anaphase onset until all chromosomes have been attached to the spindle microtubules and aligned correctly at the equatorial metaphase plate. The major checkpoint proteins in mitosis consist of mitotic arrest-deficient (Mad)1-3, budding uninhibited by benzimidazole (Bub)1, Bub3, and monopolar spindle 1(Mps1). During meiosis, for the formation of a haploid gamete, two consecutive rounds of chromosome segregation occur with only one round of DNA replication. To pull homologous chromosomes to opposite spindle poles during meiosis I, both sister kinetochores of a homologue must face toward the same pole which is very different from mitosis and meiosis II. As a core member of checkpoint proteins, the individual role of Bub3 in mammalian oocyte meiosis is unclear. In this study, using overexpression and RNA interference (RNAi) approaches, we analyzed the role of Bub3 in mouse oocyte meiosis. Our data showed that overexpressed Bub3 inhibited meiotic metaphase-anaphase transition by preventing homologous chromosome and sister chromatid segregations in meiosis I and II, respectively. Misaligned chromosomes, abnormal polar body and double polar bodies were observed in Bub3 knock-down oocytes, causing aneuploidy. Furthermore, through cold treatment combined with Bub3 overexpression, we found that overexpressed Bub3 affected the attachments of microtubules and kinetochores during metaphase-anaphase transition. We propose that as a member of SAC, Bub3 is required for regulation of both meiosis I and II, and is potentially involved in kinetochore-microtubule attachment in mammalian oocytes.

Citing Articles

Role of spindle assembly checkpoint proteins in gametogenesis and embryogenesis.

Pun R, North B Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 12:1491394.

PMID: 39911185 PMC: 11794522. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1491394.


deficiency in mouse oocytes during in vitro maturation increases chromosome segregation errors with a reduced BUBR1 at kinetochore.

Nago M, Yanai M, Ishii M, Sato Y, Odajima K, Kimura N Reprod Med Biol. 2025; 24(1):e12622.

PMID: 39845481 PMC: 11751902. DOI: 10.1002/rmb2.12622.


Kinesin KIFC3 is essential for microtubule stability and cytokinesis in oocyte meiosis.

Ju J, Zhang H, Wang Y, Hu L, Sun S Cell Commun Signal. 2024; 22(1):199.

PMID: 38553728 PMC: 10979585. DOI: 10.1186/s12964-024-01589-8.


Exploring Plant Meiosis: Insights from the Kinetochore Perspective.

Zhou K, Zhang C, Niu F, Bai H, Wu D, Deng J Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023; 45(10):7974-7995.

PMID: 37886947 PMC: 10605258. DOI: 10.3390/cimb45100504.


Biallelic variants in () cause female infertility characterized by oocyte maturation arrest.

Huang L, Li W, Dai X, Zhao S, Xu B, Wang F Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 37334967 PMC: 10319434. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.85649.


References
1.
Xiong B, Li S, Ai J, Yin S, Ouyang Y, Sun S . BRCA1 is required for meiotic spindle assembly and spindle assembly checkpoint activation in mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2008; 79(4):718-26. DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod.108.069641. View

2.
Kops G, Weaver B, Cleveland D . On the road to cancer: aneuploidy and the mitotic checkpoint. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005; 5(10):773-85. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1714. View

3.
Tsurumi C, Hoffmann S, Geley S, Graeser R, Polanski Z . The spindle assembly checkpoint is not essential for CSF arrest of mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol. 2004; 167(6):1037-50. PMC: 2172623. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.200405165. View

4.
Lo K, Kogoy J, Pfister K . The DYNLT3 light chain directly links cytoplasmic dynein to a spindle checkpoint protein, Bub3. J Biol Chem. 2007; 282(15):11205-12. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M611279200. View

5.
Johnson V, Scott M, Holt S, Hussein D, Taylor S . Bub1 is required for kinetochore localization of BubR1, Cenp-E, Cenp-F and Mad2, and chromosome congression. J Cell Sci. 2004; 117(Pt 8):1577-89. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.01006. View