» Articles » PMID: 19879395

Racial Differences in Bother for Women with Urinary Incontinence in the Establishing the Prevalence of Incontinence (EPI) Study

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2009 Nov 3
PMID 19879395
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare differences in degree of bother in black and white women with urinary incontinence (UI).

Study Design: A population-based study was conducted in black and white women in Michigan. Participants completed an interview and the Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-7). Statistical analysis included 2-way analysis of variance for post hoc comparisons of IIQ-7 scores between races at different frequencies, amounts, and types of UI.

Results: Black women with moderate UI had significantly higher IIQ-7 scores than white women (31.4 +/- 3.5 vs 23.7 +/- 1.9; P = .03). Overall, black women with urge incontinence had higher scores than white women (30.5 +/- 4.0 vs 21.0 +/- 3.0; P = .05). After adjustment for severity, black women with urge and mixed incontinence tended to be more bothered (P = .06).

Conclusion: With moderate UI (not mild or severe), black women are more bothered than white women. At this discriminatory level of UI severity, racial differences are important, because they may dictate care-seeking behavior.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Urinary Incontinence in Older White and Black Women: A Pilot Study.

Alden J, Ngwa J, Ryan A, Sanses T Int J Nurs Health Care Res (Lisle). 2023; 5(7).

PMID: 37207183 PMC: 10195058. DOI: 10.29011/2688-9501.101324.


Healthcare resource use and cost burden of urinary incontinence to United States payers.

Datar M, Pan L, McKinney J, Goss T, Pulliam S Neurourol Urodyn. 2022; 41(7):1553-1562.

PMID: 35708134 PMC: 9542745. DOI: 10.1002/nau.24989.


Urinary incontinence in pregnant women and its impact on health-related quality of life.

Wang X, Jin Y, Xu P, Feng S Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022; 20(1):13.

PMID: 35062969 PMC: 8781026. DOI: 10.1186/s12955-022-01920-2.


Adapting to Challenging Circumstances: Pessary Care in a Racially Diverse Urban Population Within a U.S. Epicenter of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Kadam Halani P, Gelman E, Duchein Y, Roselli N, Leegant A Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021; 28(2):121-125.

PMID: 34171881 PMC: 8808767. DOI: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000001085.


Severity and bother of prolapse symptoms in women with pelvic floor myofascial pain.

Dixon A, Fitzgerald C, Brincat C Int Urogynecol J. 2019; 30(11):1829-1834.

PMID: 30874833 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-019-03916-x.


References
1.
Fenner D, Trowbridge E, Patel D, Patel D, Fultz N, Miller J . Establishing the prevalence of incontinence study: racial differences in women's patterns of urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2008; 179(4):1455-60. PMC: 2879624. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.11.051. View

2.
Kubik K, Blackwell L, Heit M . Does socioeconomic status explain racial differences in urinary incontinence knowledge?. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 191(1):188-93. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.03.084. View

3.
Duong T, Korn A . A comparison of urinary incontinence among African American, Asian, Hispanic, and white women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 184(6):1083-6. DOI: 10.1067/mob.2001.115221. View

4.
Hannestad Y, Rortveit G, Hunskaar S . Help-seeking and associated factors in female urinary incontinence. The Norwegian EPINCONT Study. Epidemiology of Incontinence in the County of Nord-Trøndelag. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2002; 20(2):102-7. View

5.
Ragins A, Shan J, Thom D, Subak L, Brown J, Van Den Eeden S . Effects of urinary incontinence, comorbidity and race on quality of life outcomes in women. J Urol. 2007; 179(2):651-5. PMC: 2671469. DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2007.09.074. View