» Articles » PMID: 19876406

Parallel Workflows for Data-driven Structural Equation Modeling in Functional Neuroimaging

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Oct 31
PMID 19876406
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We present a computational framework suitable for a data-driven approach to structural equation modeling (SEM) and describe several workflows for modeling functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data within this framework. The Computational Neuroscience Applications Research Infrastructure (CNARI) employs a high-level scripting language called Swift, which is capable of spawning hundreds of thousands of simultaneous R processes (R Development Core Team, 2008), consisting of self-contained SEMs, on a high performance computing system (HPC). These self-contained R processing jobs are data objects generated by OpenMx, a plug-in for R, which can generate a single model object containing the matrices and algebraic information necessary to estimate parameters of the model. With such an infrastructure in place a structural modeler may begin to investigate exhaustive searches of the model space. Specific applications of the infrastructure, statistics related to model fit, and limitations are discussed in relation to exhaustive SEM. In particular, we discuss how workflow management techniques can help to solve large computational problems in neuroimaging.

Citing Articles

Cloud computing for voxel-wise SEM analysis of MRI data.

Pritikin J, Schmitt J, Neale M Struct Equ Modeling. 2019; 26(3):470-480.

PMID: 31133771 PMC: 6534137. DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2018.1521285.


Genetic and environmental influences on circulating NK and T cells and their relation to bipolar disorder.

Snijders G, Brouwer R, Kemner S, Bootsman F, Drexhage H, Hillegers M Int J Bipolar Disord. 2019; 7(1):4.

PMID: 30739250 PMC: 6368934. DOI: 10.1186/s40345-018-0139-3.


Vector autoregression, structural equation modeling, and their synthesis in neuroimaging data analysis.

Chen G, Glen D, Saad Z, Hamilton J, Thomason M, Gotlib I Comput Biol Med. 2011; 41(12):1142-55.

PMID: 21975109 PMC: 3223325. DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2011.09.004.

References
1.
Hackett T, Stepniewska I, Kaas J . Callosal connections of the parabelt auditory cortex in macaque monkeys. Eur J Neurosci. 1999; 11(3):856-66. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1999.00492.x. View

2.
Walsh R, Small S, Chen E, Solodkin A . Network activation during bimanual movements in humans. Neuroimage. 2008; 43(3):540-53. PMC: 2655207. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.07.019. View

3.
Neale M, Eaves L, Kendler K . The power of the classical twin study to resolve variation in threshold traits. Behav Genet. 1994; 24(3):239-58. DOI: 10.1007/BF01067191. View

4.
Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M . The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998; 106(4):283-96. DOI: 10.1016/s0013-4694(98)00022-4. View

5.
Rosa M, Soares J, Fiorani Jr M, Gattass R . Cortical afferents of visual area MT in the Cebus monkey: possible homologies between New and Old World monkeys. Vis Neurosci. 1993; 10(5):827-55. DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800006064. View