Regional Impact of Field Strength on Voxel-based Morphometry Results

Overview

Journal Hum Brain Mapp

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Neurology

Date 2009 Oct 29

PMID 19862698

Citations 25

Authors

Christine L Tardif

D Louis Collins

G Bruce Pike

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to characterize the sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry (VBM) results to choice field strength. We chose to investigate the two most widespread acquisition sequences for VBM, FLASH and MP-RAGE, at 1.5 and 3 T. We first evaluated image quality of the four acquisition protocols in terms of SNR and image uniformity. We then performed a VBM study on eight subjects scanned twice using the four protocols to evaluate differences in grey matter (GM) density and corresponding scan-rescan variability, and a power analysis for each protocol in the context a longitudinal and cross-sectional VBM study. As expected, the SNR increased significantly at 3 T for both FLASH and MP-RAGE. Image non-uniformity increased as well, in particular for MP-RAGE. The differences in CNR and contrast non-uniformity cause regional biases between protocols in the VBM results, in particular between sequences at 3 T. The power analysis results show an overall decrease in the number of subjects required in a longitudinal study to detect a difference in GM density at 3 T for MP-RAGE, but an increase for FLASH. The number of subjects required in a cross-sectional VBM study is higher at 3 T for both sequences. Our results show that each protocol has a distinct regional sensitivity pattern to morphometric change, which goes against the classical view of VBM as an unbiased whole brain analysis technique, complicates the combination of data within a VBM study and the direct comparison of VBM studies based on different protocols.

Citing Articles

HarmonyTM: multi-center data harmonization applied to distributed learning for Parkinson's disease classification.

Souza R, Stanley E, Gulve V, Moore J, Kang C, Camicioli R J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(5):054502.

PMID: 39308760 PMC: 11413651. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.5.054502.

Image-encoded biological and non-biological variables may be used as shortcuts in deep learning models trained on multisite neuroimaging data.

Souza R, Wilms M, Camacho M, Pike G, Camicioli R, Monchi O J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(12):1925-1933.

PMID: 37669158 PMC: 10654841. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad171.

Comparison of structural MRI brain measures between 1.5 and 3 T: Data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936.

Buchanan C, Munoz Maniega S, Valdes Hernandez M, Ballerini L, Barclay G, Taylor A Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42(12):3905-3921.

PMID: 34008899 PMC: 8288101. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.25473.

Assessing Age-Related Gray Matter Differences in Young Adults with Voxel-Based Morphometry: The Effect of Field Strengths.

Su F, Chen J, Chen C, Huang Y, Peng S Brain Sci. 2021; 11(4).

PMID: 33807399 PMC: 8066590. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11040447.

Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups.

Boedhoe P, van Rooij D, Hoogman M, Twisk J, Schmaal L, Abe Y Am J Psychiatry. 2020; 177(9):834-843.

PMID: 32539527 PMC: 8296070. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.19030331.

References

Sled J, Pike G . Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(4):653-62. DOI: 10.1109/42.730409. View

Ashburner J, Friston K . Voxel-based morphometry--the methods. Neuroimage. 2000; 11(6 Pt 1):805-21. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.2000.0582. View

Deoni S, Rutt B, Peters T . Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magn Reson Med. 2003; 49(3):515-26. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10407. View

Mugler 3rd J, Brookeman J . Rapid three-dimensional T1-weighted MR imaging with the MP-RAGE sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991; 1(5):561-7. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880010509. View

Lazaro L, Bargallo N, Castro-Fornieles J, Falcon C, Andres S, Calvo R . Brain changes in children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder before and after treatment: a voxel-based morphometric MRI study. Psychiatry Res. 2009; 172(2):140-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.12.007. View

Mugler 3rd J, Brookeman J . Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn Reson Med. 1990; 15(1):152-7. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910150117. View

Mueller S, Weiner M, Thal L, Petersen R, Jack C, Jagust W . The Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2006; 15(4):869-77, xi-xii. PMC: 2376747. DOI: 10.1016/j.nic.2005.09.008. View

Boyes R, Gunter J, Frost C, Janke A, Yeatman T, Hill D . Intensity non-uniformity correction using N3 on 3-T scanners with multichannel phased array coils. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(4):1752-62. PMC: 2562663. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.10.026. View

Han X, Jovicich J, Salat D, van der Kouwe A, Quinn B, Czanner S . Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: the effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer. Neuroimage. 2006; 32(1):180-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.051. View

10.

Runge V, Kirsch J, Thomas G, Mugler 3rd J . Clinical comparison of three-dimensional MP-RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1991; 1(4):493-500. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1880010417. View

11.

Wright I, McGuire P, Poline J, Travere J, Murray R, Frith C . A voxel-based method for the statistical analysis of gray and white matter density applied to schizophrenia. Neuroimage. 1995; 2(4):244-52. DOI: 10.1006/nimg.1995.1032. View

12.

Cocosco C, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A fully automatic and robust brain MRI tissue classification method. Med Image Anal. 2003; 7(4):513-27. DOI: 10.1016/s1361-8415(03)00037-9. View

13.

Stankiewicz J, Neema M, Alsop D, Healy B, Arora A, Buckle G . Spinal cord lesions and clinical status in multiple sclerosis: A 1.5 T and 3 T MRI study. J Neurol Sci. 2009; 279(1-2):99-105. PMC: 2679653. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2008.11.009. View

14.

Chen J, Feng Z, Jin J . Numerical simulation of SAR and B1-field inhomogeneity of shielded RF coils loaded with the human head. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1998; 45(5):650-9. DOI: 10.1109/10.668756. View

15.

Bluml S, Schad L, Scharf J, Wenz F, Knopp M, Lorenz W . A comparison of magnetization prepared 3D gradient-echo (MP-RAGE) sequences for imaging of intracranial lesions. Magn Reson Imaging. 1996; 14(3):329-35. DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(95)02095-b. View

16.

Tohka J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . Fast and robust parameter estimation for statistical partial volume models in brain MRI. Neuroimage. 2004; 23(1):84-97. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.05.007. View

17.

Sled J, Zijdenbos A, Evans A . A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1998; 17(1):87-97. DOI: 10.1109/42.668698. View

18.

Segall J, Turner J, van Erp T, White T, Bockholt H, Gollub R . Voxel-based morphometric multisite collaborative study on schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2008; 35(1):82-95. PMC: 2643956. DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbn150. View

19.

Smith S . Fast robust automated brain extraction. Hum Brain Mapp. 2002; 17(3):143-55. PMC: 6871816. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.10062. View

20.

Dickerson B, Fenstermacher E, Salat D, Wolk D, Maguire R, Desikan R . Detection of cortical thickness correlates of cognitive performance: Reliability across MRI scan sessions, scanners, and field strengths. Neuroimage. 2007; 39(1):10-8. PMC: 2141650. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.08.042. View