Trends in Hospital Cost and Revenue, 1994-2005: How Are They Related to HMO Penetration, Concentration, and For-profit Ownership?

Overview

Journal Health Serv Res

Specialty Health Services

Date 2009 Oct 21

PMID 19840134

Citations 4

Authors

Yu-Chu Shen

Vivian Y Wu

Glenn Melnick

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objective: Analyze trends in hospital cost and revenue, as well as price and quantity (1994-2005) as a function of health maintenance organization (HMO) penetration, HMO concentration, and for-profit (FP) HMO market share.

Data: Medicare hospital cost reports, AHA Annual Surveys, HMO data from Interstudy, and other supplemental data.

Study Design: A retrospective study of all short-term, general, nonfederal hospitals in metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) in the United States from 1994 to 2005, using hospital/MSA fixed-effects translog regression models.

Principal Findings: A 10 percentage point increase in HMO enrollment is associated with 4.1-4.2 percent reduction in costs and revenues in the pre-2000 period but only a 2.1-2.5 percent reduction in the post-2000 period. Hospital revenue in HMO-dominant markets (highly concentrated HMO market and competitive hospital market) is 19-27 percent lower than other types of markets, and the difference is most likely due mainly to lower prices and to a lesser extent lower utilization.

Conclusions: The historical difference of lower spending in high HMO penetration markets compared with low HMO markets narrowed after 2000 and the relative concentration between HMO and hospital markets can substantially influence hospital spending. Additional research is needed to understand how different aspects of these two markets have changed and interacted and how they are causally linked to spending trends.

Citing Articles

Characterizing the Relationship Between Payer Mix and Diagnostic Intensity at the Hospital Level.

Ellenbogen M, Prichett L, Brotman D J Gen Intern Med. 2022; 37(15):3783-3788.

PMID: 35266125 PMC: 9640504. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07453-0.

Do All Hospital Systems Have Market Power? Association Between Hospital System Types and Cardiac Surgery Prices.

Choi S, Dor A Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2019; 6:2333392819886414.

PMID: 31763372 PMC: 6851608. DOI: 10.1177/2333392819886414.

Hospital Advertising, Competition, and HCAHPS: Does It Pay to Advertise?.

Huppertz J, Bowman R, Bizer G, Sidhu M, McVeigh C Health Serv Res. 2016; 52(4):1590-1611.

PMID: 27546176 PMC: 5517686. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.12549.

Market competition and price of disease management programmes: an observational study.

van Dijk C, Venema B, de Jong J, de Bakker D BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:510.

PMID: 25359224 PMC: 4219132. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0510-8.

References

Norton S, Zuckerman S . Trends in Medicaid physician fees, 1993-1998. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000; 19(4):222-32. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.19.4.222. View

Mitchell S, Schlesinger M . Managed care and gender disparities in problematic health care experiences. Health Serv Res. 2005; 40(5 Pt 1):1489-513. PMC: 1361205. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00422.x. View

Miller R, Luft H . Managed care plan performance since 1980. A literature analysis. JAMA. 1994; 271(19):1512-9. View

Bradford W, Krumholz H . The effect of managed care penetration on the treatment of AMI in the fee-for-service Medicare population. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003; 2(4):265-83. DOI: 10.1023/a:1022304101108. View

Younis M, Rivers P, Fottler M . The impact of HMO and hospital competition on hospital costs. J Health Care Finance. 2008; 31(4):60-74. View

Santerre R, Adams A . The effect of competition on reserve capacity: The case of California hospitals in the late 1990s. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003; 2(3):205-18. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020489610125. View

Marquis M, Rogowski J, Escarce J . The managed care backlash: did consumers vote with their feet?. Inquiry. 2005; 41(4):376-90. DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.4.376. View

Zwanziger J, Mooney C . Has competition lowered hospital prices?. Inquiry. 2005; 42(1):73-85. DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_42.1.73. View

Kaestner R, Dubay L, Kenney G . Managed care and infant health: an evaluation of Medicaid in the US. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(8):1815-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.09.001. View

10.

Shen Y . The effect of financial pressure on the quality of care in hospitals. J Health Econ. 2003; 22(2):243-69. DOI: 10.1016/S0167-6296(02)00124-8. View

11.

Scanlon D, Chernew M, Swaminathan S, Lee W . Competition in health insurance markets: limitations of current measures for policy analysis. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(6 Suppl):37S-55S. DOI: 10.1177/1077558706293834. View

12.

Meara E, Landrum M, Ayanian J, McNeil B, Guadagnoli E . The effect of managed care market share on appropriate use of coronary angiography among traditional Medicare beneficiaries. Inquiry. 2004; 41(2):144-58. DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.2.144. View

13.

Gaskin D, Hadley J . The impact of HMO penetration on the rate of hospital cost inflation, 1985-1993. Inquiry. 1997; 34(3):205-16. View

14.

Shen Y, Melnick G . The effects of HMO ownership on hospital costs and revenues: is there a difference between for-profit and nonprofit plans?. Inquiry. 2005; 41(3):255-67. View

15.

Morrisey M, Jensen G, Gabel J . Managed care and employer premiums. Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2003; 3(2):95-116. DOI: 10.1023/a:1023317214453. View

16.

Wholey D, Engberg J, Bryce C . A descriptive analysis of average productivity among health maintenance organizations, 1985 to 2001. Health Care Manag Sci. 2006; 9(2):189-206. DOI: 10.1007/s10729-006-7666-7. View

17.

Zwanziger J, Khan N . Safety-net activities and hospital contracting with managed care organizations. Med Care Res Rev. 2006; 63(6 Suppl):90S-111S. DOI: 10.1177/1077558706293838. View

18.

Baker L . Association of managed care market share and health expenditures for fee-for-service Medicare patients. JAMA. 1999; 281(5):432-7. DOI: 10.1001/jama.281.5.432. View

19.

Chakravarty S, Gaynor M, Klepper S, Vogt W . Does the profit motive make Jack nimble? Ownership form and the evolution of the US hospital industry. Health Econ. 2006; 15(4):345-61. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1111. View

20.

Heidenreich P, McClellan M, Frances C, Baker L . The relation between managed care market share and the treatment of elderly fee-for-service patients with myocardial infarction. Am J Med. 2002; 112(3):176-82. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9343(01)01098-1. View