» Articles » PMID: 19839689

A Theory of Utility Conditionals: Paralogical Reasoning from Decision-theoretic Leakage

Overview
Journal Psychol Rev
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Oct 21
PMID 19839689
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many "if p, then q" conditionals have decision-theoretic features, such as antecedents or consequents that relate to the utility functions of various agents. These decision-theoretic features leak into reasoning processes, resulting in various paralogical conclusions. The theory of utility conditionals offers a unified account of the various forms that this phenomenon can take. The theory is built on 2 main components: (1) a representational tool (the utility grid), which summarizes in compact form the decision-theoretic features of a conditional, and (2) a set of folk axioms of decision, which reflect reasoners' beliefs about the way most agents make their decisions. Applying the folk axioms to the utility grid of a conditional allows for the systematic prediction of the paralogical conclusions invited by the utility grid's decision-theoretic features. The theory of utility conditionals significantly extends the scope of current theories of conditional inference and moves reasoning research toward a greater integration with decision-making research.

Citing Articles

Utilitarian Moral Judgment Exclusively Coheres with Inference from Is to Ought.

Elqayam S, Wilkinson M, Thompson V, Over D, Evans J Front Psychol. 2017; 8:1042.

PMID: 28690572 PMC: 5480028. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01042.


Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.

Haigh M, Wood J, Stewart A Mem Cognit. 2016; 44(5):819-36.

PMID: 26886759 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-016-0596-9.


Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals.

Gazzo Castaneda L, Knauff M Mem Cognit. 2015; 44(3):499-517.

PMID: 26689704 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-015-0574-7.


A decision network account of reasoning about other people's choices.

Jern A, Kemp C Cognition. 2015; 142:12-38.

PMID: 26010559 PMC: 4500738. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.006.


Social values as arguments: similar is convincing.

Maio G, Hahn U, Frost J, Kuppens T, Rehman N, Kamble S Front Psychol. 2014; 5:829.

PMID: 25147529 PMC: 4124278. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00829.