» Articles » PMID: 19830411

Detection of Visual Feedback Delay in Active and Passive Self-body Movements

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Oct 16
PMID 19830411
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Temporal congruency between the efference copy of a motor command and the reafferent sensory feedback is crucial for identifying self-generated body movements. We investigated how temporal discrepancy between the efference copy and visual feedback affects the self-body movement recognition process. Subjects experienced active and passive hand movements under conditions of delayed visual feedback (118-352 ms) and judged whether observed hand movements were delayed with respect to the felt movement. The results showed that the discrimination threshold of visual feedback delay (50% detection rate) was not significantly different between active and passive movements. In contrast, the judgment probability curve was significantly steeper for active than passive movements. This indicates that the efference copy enhances the contrast between synchronous and asynchronous movements but does not narrow the time window in this process. We discuss processing of active and passive movements in relation to the senses of self-agency and self-ownership.

Citing Articles

Pilot study of the relation between various dynamics of avatar experience and perceptual characteristics.

Okamoto Y, Matsui K, Ando T, Atsuumi K, Taniguchi K, Hirai H PeerJ Comput Sci. 2024; 10:e2042.

PMID: 38855230 PMC: 11157551. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.2042.


Investigating the impact of motion visual synchrony on self face recognition using real time morphing.

Kasahara S, Kumasaki N, Shimizu K Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):13090.

PMID: 38849381 PMC: 11161490. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63233-2.


Sense of agency at a gaze-contingent display with jittery temporal delay.

Kim J, Yoshida T Front Psychol. 2024; 15():1364076.

PMID: 38827897 PMC: 11141391. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1364076.


Augmenting locomotor perception by remapping tactile foot sensation to the back.

Jouybari A, Ferraroli N, Bouri M, Alaoui S, Kannape O, Blanke O J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024; 21(1):65.

PMID: 38678291 PMC: 11055306. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01344-7.


Closed-loop experiments and brain machine interfaces with multiphoton microscopy.

Hira R Neurophotonics. 2024; 11(3):033405.

PMID: 38375331 PMC: 10876015. DOI: 10.1117/1.NPh.11.3.033405.


References
1.
Balslev D, Nielsen F, Lund T, Law I, Paulson O . Similar brain networks for detecting visuo-motor and visuo-proprioceptive synchrony. Neuroimage. 2006; 31(1):308-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.037. View

2.
Shimada S, Hiraki K, Oda I . The parietal role in the sense of self-ownership with temporal discrepancy between visual and proprioceptive feedbacks. Neuroimage. 2005; 24(4):1225-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.039. View

3.
Tsakiris M, Prabhu G, Haggard P . Having a body versus moving your body: How agency structures body-ownership. Conscious Cogn. 2005; 15(2):423-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2005.09.004. View

4.
Shimada S, Fukuda K, Hiraki K . Rubber hand illusion under delayed visual feedback. PLoS One. 2009; 4(7):e6185. PMC: 2702687. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006185. View

5.
Gallagher I . Philosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000; 4(1):14-21. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5. View