» Articles » PMID: 19830132

Foreign Body Granuloma in the Anterior Abdominal Wall Mimicking an Acute Appendicular Lump and Induced by a Translocated Copper-T Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: a Case Report

Overview
Journal J Med Case Rep
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2009 Oct 16
PMID 19830132
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Intrauterine contraceptive devices may at times perforate and migrate to adjacent organs. Such uterine perforation usually passes unnoticed with development of potentially serious complications.

Case Presentation: A 25-year-old woman of North Indian origin presented with an acute tender lump in the right iliac fossa. The lump was initially thought to be an appendicular lump and treated conservatively. Resolution of the lump was incomplete. On exploratory laparotomy, a hard suspicious mass was found in the anterior abdominal wall of the right iliac fossa. Wide excision and bisection of the mass revealed a copper-T embedded inside. Examination of the uterus did not show any evidence of perforation. The next day, the patient gave a history of past copper-T Intrauterine contraceptive device insertion.

Conclusions: Copper-T insertion is one of the simplest contraceptive methods but its neglect with inadequate follow-up may lead to uterine perforation and extra-uterine migration. Regular self-examination for the "threads" supplemented with abdominal X-ray and/or ultrasound in the follow-up may detect copper-T migration early. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of intrauterine contraceptive device migration to the anterior abdominal wall of the right iliac fossa.

Citing Articles

Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives.

Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell D Open Access J Contracept. 2018; 7:19-32.

PMID: 29386934 PMC: 5683155. DOI: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546.


Intrauterine device may trigger typical attacks of familial Mediterranean fever: a case report.

Kurultak I, Kinalp C, Ceri M, Evrenkaya T Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2014; 127(1-2):68-70.

PMID: 25398289 DOI: 10.1007/s00508-014-0631-4.

References
1.
Mittal S, Gupta I, Lata P, Mahajan U, Gupta A . Management of translocated and incarcerated intrauterine contraceptive devices. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986; 26(3):232-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1986.tb01574.x. View

2.
Sasidharan K, Chally R . Intravesical migration of Lippes loop with stone formation. Br J Urol. 1988; 61(4):363-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1988.tb13980.x. View

3.
Ohana E, Sheiner E, Leron E, Mazor M . Appendix perforation by an intrauterine contraceptive device. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000; 88(2):129-31. DOI: 10.1016/s0301-2115(99)00142-6. View

4.
Eke N, Okpani A . Extrauterine translocated contraceptive device: a presentation of five cases and revisit of the enigmatic issues of iatrogenic perforation and migration. Afr J Reprod Health. 2004; 7(3):117-23. View

5.
Chang H, Chen T, Hsieh C, Chen C, Yu J, Liu Y . Intrauterine contraceptive device appendicitis: a case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2005; 11(34):5414-5. PMC: 4622824. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v11.i34.5414. View