» Articles » PMID: 19829038

Dorsal Onlay Versus Ventral Onlay Urethroplasty for Anterior Urethral Stricture: a Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal Urol Int
Publisher Karger
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Oct 16
PMID 19829038
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Ventral and dorsal sides of urethra were chosen to place grafts in free graft onlay urethroplasty. As the advantages and disadvantages of these two sites are still unclear, we systemically analyzed clinical articles reported in the literature.

Materials And Methods: The literature till October 2007 regarding the use of ventral/dorsal graft urethroplasty in anterior urethral strictures was searched using the MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases. 'Urethral stricture' or 'urethral stenosis' and 'urethroplasty' or 'urethral reconstruction' were used as search terms. Data were analyzed independently by two reviewers.

Results: 49 studies (1,263 cases) were included. The success rates of ventral onlay urethroplasty (750 cases) and dorsal onlay (513 cases) were 82.5 and 86.9% (p = 0.034). Buccal mucosa graft had the highest success rate (88.1%) and had a similar rate between the dorsal and ventral onlay techniques (89.2 vs. 87.6%, p = 0.472). For free skin graft, the dorsal onlay success rate was higher than ventral (84.7 vs. 74.7, p = 0.016). Bulbar urethral stricture achieved the higher success rate than pendulous urethral stricture (87.4 vs. 77.6%, p = 0.019).

Conclusions: Dorsal onlay is better than ventral onlay in free skin graft urethroplasty. Bulbar urethra is the most suitable site for graft onlay urethroplasty, and buccal mucosa graft is helpful for achieving good results.

Citing Articles

Ventral versus dorsal onlay buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty for non-traumatic proximal bulbar urethral strictures in sexually active men: erectile and urinary functions.

Mousa A, Eissa A, Abdel Raheem A, Zoeir A World J Urol. 2025; 43(1):87.

PMID: 39869201 PMC: 11772550. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-025-05441-7.


Decision regret and long-term success rates after ventral buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

Santiago J, Gross M, Accioly J, Voelzke B, Breyer B, Khouri R BJU Int. 2024; 135(2):303-309.

PMID: 39429069 PMC: 11745999. DOI: 10.1111/bju.16566.


Small intestinal submucosa graft bulbar urethroplasty is a viable technique: results compared to buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty after propensity score matching.

Palminteri E, Toso S, Preto M, Gatti L, Sedigh O, Buffi N World J Urol. 2024; 42(1):123.

PMID: 38453722 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04795-8.


'Pee'BuSt Trial: A single-centre prospective randomized study comparing functional and anatomic outcomes after augmentation  urethroplasty with penile skin graft versus buccal mucosa graft for anterior urethral stricture disease.

Tyagi S, Parmar K, Singh S, Sharma A, Shukla M, Sharma A World J Urol. 2021; 40(2):475-481.

PMID: 34655304 PMC: 8520101. DOI: 10.1007/s00345-021-03843-x.


Buccal mucosa or penile skin for substitution urethroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sharma G, Sharma S, Parmar K Indian J Urol. 2020; 36(2):81-88.

PMID: 32549657 PMC: 7279095. DOI: 10.4103/iju.IJU_298_19.