» Articles » PMID: 19823979

Clinical Benefits of a Multivariate Prediction Model for Bladder Cancer: a Decision Analytic Approach

Overview
Journal Cancer
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Oct 14
PMID 19823979
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: It has been demonstrated that multivariate prediction models predict cancer outcomes more accurately than cancer stage; however, the effects of these models on clinical management are unclear. The objective of the current study was to determine whether a previously published multivariate prediction model for bladder cancer ("bladder nomogram") improved medical decision making when referral for adjuvant chemotherapy was used as a model.

Methods: Data were analyzed from an international cohort study of 4462 patients who underwent cystectomy without chemotherapy from 1969 to 2004. The number of patients eligible for chemotherapy was determined using pathologic stage criteria (lymph node-positive disease or pathologic T3 [pT3] or pT4 tumor classification) and for 3 cutoff levels on the bladder nomogram (10%, 25%, and 70% risk of recurrence with surgery alone). The number of recurrences was calculated by applying a relative risk reduction to the baseline risk among eligible patients. Clinical net benefit was then calculated by combining recurrences and treatments and weighting the latter by a factor related to drug tolerability.

Results: A nomogram cutoff outperformed pathologic stage for chemotherapy in every scenario of drug effectiveness and tolerability. For a drug with a relative risk of 0.80, with which clinicians would treat <or=20 patients to prevent 1 recurrence, use of the nomogram was equivalent to a strategy that resulted in 60 fewer chemotherapy treatments per 1000 patients without any increase in recurrence rates.

Conclusions: The authors concluded that referring patients who undergo cystectomy to adjuvant chemotherapy on the basis of a multivariate model is likely to lead to better patient outcomes than the use of pathologic stage. Further research is warranted to evaluate the clinical effects of multivariate prediction models.

Citing Articles

Development of a prediction model for clinically-relevant fatigue: a multi-cancer approach.

Adiprakoso D, Katsimpokis D, Oerlemans S, Ezendam N, van Maaren M, van Til J Qual Life Res. 2024; 34(1):231-245.

PMID: 39516438 PMC: 11802682. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-024-03807-9.


Incidence, prognostic factors and survival in bladder cancer patients: a population-based study.

Wang S, Ge C, Zhang J Transl Cancer Res. 2022; 11(8):2742-2756.

PMID: 36093535 PMC: 9459577. DOI: 10.21037/tcr-22-46.


Evaluating the impact of policies recommending PrEP to subpopulations of men and transgender women who have sex with men based on demographic and behavioral risk factors.

Janes H, Brown M, Glidden D, Mayer K, Buchbinder S, McMahan V PLoS One. 2019; 14(9):e0222183.

PMID: 31536518 PMC: 6752862. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222183.


Machine learning models for predicting post-cystectomy recurrence and survival in bladder cancer patients.

Hasnain Z, Mason J, Gill K, Miranda G, Gill I, Kuhn P PLoS One. 2019; 14(2):e0210976.

PMID: 30785915 PMC: 6382101. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210976.


Do we have biomarkers to predict response to neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy in bladder cancer?.

Wezel F, Vallo S, Roghmann F Transl Androl Urol. 2018; 6(6):1067-1080.

PMID: 29354494 PMC: 5760384. DOI: 10.21037/tau.2017.09.18.


References
1.
Kattan M, Zelefsky M, Kupelian P, Scardino P, Fuks Z, Leibel S . Pretreatment nomogram for predicting the outcome of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000; 18(19):3352-9. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.19.3352. View

2.
Wierda W, OBrien S, Wang X, Faderl S, Ferrajoli A, Do K . Prognostic nomogram and index for overall survival in previously untreated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2007; 109(11):4679-85. DOI: 10.1182/blood-2005-12-051458. View

3.
Bennicke P . [Treatment of lumbar disc prolapse]. Ugeskr Laeger. 2008; 170(36):2804. View

4.
Peeters K, Kattan M, Hartgrink H, Kranenbarg E, Karpeh M, Brennan M . Validation of a nomogram for predicting disease-specific survival after an R0 resection for gastric carcinoma. Cancer. 2005; 103(4):702-7. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.20783. View

5.
Vickers A, Kramer B, Baker S . Selecting patients for randomized trials: a systematic approach based on risk group. Trials. 2006; 7:30. PMC: 1609186. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-30. View