» Articles » PMID: 19818155

No Effect of Mate Novelty on Sexual Motivation in the Freshwater Snail Biomphalaria Glabrata

Overview
Journal Front Zool
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Oct 13
PMID 19818155
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: When mating effort (e.g. via ejaculates) is high, males are expected to strategically allocate their resources depending on the expected fitness gains from a given mating opportunity. One mechanism to achieve strategic mating is the Coolidge effect, where male sexual motivation declines across repeated encounters with a familiar partner, but resuscitates when encountering a novel female. Experimental tests of male mate choice via mechanisms such as the Coolidge effect, however, remain scarce. Moreover, it is untested to date whether the Coolidge effect occurs in a sex-specific manner in simultaneous hermaphrodites, where the motivation to mate with a familiar partner may vary with previous mating activity in the male or female role.

Results: We exposed focal hermaphroditic freshwater snails, Biomphalaria glabrata, repeatedly to either a familiar or a novel partner. None of our proxies of sexual motivation (remating likelihood, mating delay, copulation duration) varied between the novel and familiar partner treatments. Moreover, the mating role taken during the first copulation did not affect the subsequent choice of mating roles in the familiar partner treatment as would be expected if focals preferred to avoid mating twice in the same role with a familiar partner. This indicates the absence of sex-specific effects of partner novelty.

Conclusion: Our data indicate that mate novelty does affect neither overall sexual motivation nor the choice of mating roles in B. glabrata. Hence, male mate choice via a Coolidge effect appears inexistent in this invertebrate hermaphrodite. We discuss the possible roles of insufficient fitness gains for discriminatory behaviour in populations with frequent mate encounters as well as poor mate discrimination capacities. Our findings lend also no support to the novel prediction that sexual motivation in simultaneous hermaphrodites varies with the mating roles taken during previous copulations, calling for empirical investigation in further hermaphrodite systems.

Citing Articles

Sex determination and gender expression: Reproductive investment in snails.

Koene J Mol Reprod Dev. 2016; 84(2):132-143.

PMID: 27245260 PMC: 6220956. DOI: 10.1002/mrd.22662.


Effects of age, size, and mating history on sex role decision of a simultaneous hermaphrodite.

Nakadera Y, Swart E, Maas J, Montagne-Wajer K, Ter Maat A, Koene J Behav Ecol. 2015; 26(1):232-241.

PMID: 25713474 PMC: 4309981. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/aru184.


Sex allocation and investment into pre- and post-copulatory traits in simultaneous hermaphrodites: the role of polyandry and local sperm competition.

Scharer L, Pen I Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2013; 368(1613):20120052.

PMID: 23339243 PMC: 3576586. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0052.


Neuro-endocrine control of reproduction in hermaphroditic freshwater snails: mechanisms and evolution.

Koene J Front Behav Neurosci. 2010; 4:167.

PMID: 21088700 PMC: 2981420. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00167.

References
1.
Petrulis A, Eichenbaum H . The perirhinal-entorhinal cortex, but not the hippocampus, is critical for expression of individual recognition in the context of the Coolidge effect. Neuroscience. 2003; 122(3):599-607. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2003.08.009. View

2.
Lester G, Gorzalka B . Effect of novel and familiar mating partners on the duration of sexual receptivity in the female hamster. Behav Neural Biol. 1988; 49(3):398-405. DOI: 10.1016/s0163-1047(88)90418-9. View

3.
Nakatsuru K, Kramer D . Is sperm cheap? Limited male fertility and female choice in the lemon tetra (pisces, characidae). Science. 1982; 216(4547):753-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.216.4547.753. View

4.
Odeen A, Moray C . Drosophila melanogaster virgins are more likely to mate with strangers than familiar flies. Naturwissenschaften. 2007; 95(3):253-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00114-007-0314-3. View

5.
Velando A, Eiroa J, Dominguez J . Brainless but not clueless: earthworms boost their ejaculates when they detect fecund non-virgin partners. Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1638):1067-72. PMC: 2600910. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1718. View