» Articles » PMID: 19815785

A Stereo Disadvantage for Recognizing Rotated Familiar Objects

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2009 Oct 10
PMID 19815785
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We tested recognition of familiar objects in two different conditions: mono, where stimuli were displayed as flat, 2-D images, and stereo, where objects were displayed with stereoscopic depth information. In three experiments, participants performed a sequential matching task, where an object was rotated by up to 180 degrees between presentations. When the 180 degrees rotation resulted in large changes in depth for object components, recognition performance in the mono condition showed better performance at 180 degrees rotations than at smaller rotations, but stereo presentations showed a monotonic increase in response time with rotation. However, 180 degrees rotations that did not result in much depth variation showed similar patterns of results for mono and stereo conditions. These results suggest that in some circumstances, the lack of explicit 3-D information in 2-D images may influence the recognition of familiar objects when they are depicted on flat computer monitors.

Citing Articles

Stereo viewing modulates three-dimensional shape processing during object recognition: A high-density ERP study.

Oliver Z, Cristino F, Roberts M, Pegna A, Leek E J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017; 44(4):518-534.

PMID: 29022728 PMC: 5896504. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000444.


Learning the 3-D structure of objects from 2-D views depends on shape, not format.

Tian M, Yamins D, Grill-Spector K J Vis. 2016; 16(7):7.

PMID: 27153196 PMC: 4898268. DOI: 10.1167/16.7.7.

References
1.
Johnston E . Systematic distortions of shape from stereopsis. Vision Res. 1991; 31(7-8):1351-60. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90056-b. View

2.
Burke D, Taubert J, Higman T . Are face representations viewpoint dependent? A stereo advantage for generalizing across different views of faces. Vision Res. 2007; 47(16):2164-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.04.018. View

3.
HAYWARD W, Tarr M, Corderoy A . Recognizing silhouettes and shaded images across depth rotation. Perception. 2000; 28(10):1197-215. DOI: 10.1068/p2971. View

4.
Buckley D, Frisby J . Interaction of stereo, texture and outline cues in the shape perception of three-dimensional ridges. Vision Res. 1993; 33(7):919-33. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90075-8. View

5.
Knill D, Saunders J . Do humans optimally integrate stereo and texture information for judgments of surface slant?. Vision Res. 2003; 43(24):2539-58. DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00458-9. View