» Articles » PMID: 19815652

Preoperative Weekly Cisplatin, Epirubicin, and Paclitaxel (PET) Improves Prognosis in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: an Update of the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group (SICOG) Randomised Trial 9908

Overview
Journal Ann Oncol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Oct 10
PMID 19815652
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The present article reports the updated survival outcome of the 200 patients enrolled in the Southern Italy Cooperative Oncology Group 9908 trial, which compared 12 weekly cycles of cisplatin-epirubicin-paclitaxel (PET) with 4 triweekly (once every 3 weeks) cycles of epirubicin-paclitaxel (ET) in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC).

Methods: The effects of treatment, pathologically documented response (pathological response), pre- and post-treatment biomarkers on relapse-free survival (RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) are analysed.

Results: At a median follow-up of 74 (range 48-105 months) months, the 5-year RFS, DMFS, and OS were 64 % versus 53% (P = 0.11), 73% versus 55% (P = 0.04), and 82% versus 69% (P = 0.07) in PET and ET, respectively. At multivariate analysis, after adjusting treatment effect for pretreatment biomarkers, PET independently predicted better DMFS (P = 0.018) and OS (P = 0.03), whereas the impact on RFS was of borderline significance (0.057). PET treatment was significantly better than ET treatment only in high-grade or highly proliferating tumours. The better outcome in PET arm was the results of both the higher rate of patients with optimal pathological response and the lower rate of patients with biologically aggressive residual tumour.

Conclusions: The PET weekly regimen significantly improves both DMFS and OS in LABC patients, compared with the triweekly ET combination. The therapeutic advantage is limited to patients with highly aggressive tumours.

Citing Articles

Platinum-based chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer.

Mason S, Willson M, Egger S, Beith J, Dear R, Goodwin A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023; 9:CD014805.

PMID: 37681577 PMC: 10486188. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD014805.pub2.


Evaluation of pathological complete response as surrogate endpoint in neoadjuvant randomised clinical trials of early stage breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Conforti F, Pala L, Sala I, Oriecuia C, De Pas T, Specchia C BMJ. 2021; 375:e066381.

PMID: 34933868 PMC: 8689398. DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066381.


A Proposal to Redefine Pathologic Complete Remission as Endpoint following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Dediu M, Zielinski C Breast Care (Basel). 2020; 15(1):67-71.

PMID: 32231500 PMC: 7098275. DOI: 10.1159/000500620.


Clinical efficacy of weekly cisplatin for treatment of patients with breast cancer.

Ma Y, Zhang N, An N, Li W, Zhao W, Liu Y Medicine (Baltimore). 2019; 98(37):e17114.

PMID: 31517847 PMC: 6750322. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000017114.


Weekly paclitaxel and cisplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy with locally advanced breast cancer: a prospective, single arm, phase II study.

Zhou L, Xu S, Yin W, Lin Y, Du Y, Jiang Y Oncotarget. 2017; 8(45):79305-79314.

PMID: 29108309 PMC: 5668042. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.17954.