» Articles » PMID: 19814831

Health-promoting Lifestyles of University Students in Mainland China

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Oct 10
PMID 19814831
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Health-promoting lifestyles of adolescents are closely related to their current and subsequent health status. However, few studies in mainland China have examined health-promoting behaviors among university students, notwithstanding the dramatic development of higher education over the past two decades. Moreover, no study has applied a standardized scale to such an investigation. The adolescent health promotion (AHP) scale has been developed and is commonly used for measuring adolescent health-promoting lifestyles in Taiwan. The aim of this study is to determine the appropriateness of the AHP for use in mainland China.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed on a total of 420 undergraduates, who were randomly selected using a two-stage stratified sampling method in a university in Guangzhou city, mainland China. The simplified Chinese version of the AHP scale, comprising six dimensions (Nutrition behavior, Social support, Life-appreciation, Exercise behavior, Health-responsibility and Stress-management), was used to measure health-promoting lifestyles among undergraduates. The reliability of the AHP scale was assessed using split-half reliability coefficients, intraclass correlation coefficients and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was assessed by factor analysis and correlation analysis. Factors associated with health-promoting lifestyles were identified using multiple linear regression.

Results: Cronbach's coefficients were greater than 0.7 in all dimensions of the AHP scale except for Nutrition behavior (0.684). Intraclass correlation coefficients ranged from 0.689 to 0.921. Split-half reliability coefficients were higher than 0.7 in three AHP dimensions (Social support, Life-appreciation and Exercise behavior). Our results were generally in accordance with the theoretical construction of the AHP scale. The mean score for each of the six dimensions was lower than 70. Gender and grade were the factors primarily associated with health-promoting lifestyles among undergraduates.

Conclusion: The AHP is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing health-promoting lifestyles of undergraduates in mainland China, which remain at a low level. Health behavior education taking account of gender and grade differences may also be applied.

Citing Articles

An Assessment of Health Behaviours in Primary Care Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Gawlowska B, Chawlowska E Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(14).

PMID: 39057548 PMC: 11275404. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12141405.


Key factors affecting health promoting behaviors among adolescents: a scoping review.

Tabrizi J, Doshmangir L, Khoshmaram N, Shakibazadeh E, Abdolahi H, Khabiri R BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):58.

PMID: 38212786 PMC: 10782684. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-10510-x.


The Effect of Base Theory Educational Intervention on Health-Promoting Lifestyle in Women Susceptible to Cardiovascular Diseases: Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior.

Izadpanah P, Saadat N, Kabiri B, Mohammadkhah F, Afzali Harsini P, Jeihooni A Cardiol Res Pract. 2023; 2023:8528123.

PMID: 37519305 PMC: 10382243. DOI: 10.1155/2023/8528123.


Assessment of health promotion behavior and associated factors among the northern Saudi adolescent population: a cross-sectional study.

M Alruwaili T, Alshehri S, Thirunavukkarasu A, Elfarargy M, Tariq Alanazi K, Muharib R Alruwaili K PeerJ. 2023; 11:e15567.

PMID: 37397023 PMC: 10312158. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15567.


Health-promoting lifestyle and its predictors among health-related and non-health-related university students in Taiwan: a cross-sectional quantitative study.

Chao D BMC Public Health. 2023; 23(1):827.

PMID: 37147650 PMC: 10161567. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15760-2.


References
1.
Chen M, James K, Wang E . Comparison of health-promoting behavior between Taiwanese and American adolescents: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 44(1):59-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.11.015. View

2.
Chen M, Shiao Y, Gau Y . Comparison of adolescent health-related behavior in different family structures. J Nurs Res. 2007; 15(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1097/01.jnr.0000387594.86790.fa. View

3.
Chen M, Wang E, Chang C . Cross-validation and discriminant validity of Adolescent Health Promotion Scale among overweight and nonoverweight adolescents in Taiwan. Public Health Nurs. 2006; 23(6):555-60. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2006.00596.x. View

4.
Deeks A, Lombard C, Michelmore J, Teede H . The effects of gender and age on health related behaviors. BMC Public Health. 2009; 9:213. PMC: 2713232. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-213. View

5.
Sanci L, Coffey C, Veit F, Carr-Gregg M, Patton G, Day N . Evaluation of the effectiveness of an educational intervention for general practitioners in adolescent health care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2000; 320(7229):224-30. PMC: 27271. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.320.7229.224. View