» Articles » PMID: 19814793

Electrical Muscle Stimulation Preserves the Muscle Mass of Critically Ill Patients: a Randomized Study

Overview
Journal Crit Care
Specialty Critical Care
Date 2009 Oct 10
PMID 19814793
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Critically ill patients are characterized by increased loss of muscle mass, partially attributed to sepsis and multiple organ failure, as well as immobilization. Recent studies have shown that electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) may be an alternative to active exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and chronic heart failure (CHF) patients with myopathy. The aim of our study was to investigate the EMS effects on muscle mass preservation of critically ill patients with the use of ultrasonography (US).

Methods: Forty-nine critically ill patients (age: 59 +/- 21 years) with an APACHE II admission score >or=13 were randomly assigned after stratification upon admission to receive daily EMS sessions of both lower extremities (EMS-group) or to the control group (control group). Muscle mass was evaluated with US, by measuring the cross sectional diameter (CSD) of the vastus intermedius and the rectus femoris of the quadriceps muscle.

Results: Twenty-six patients were finally evaluated. Right rectus femoris and right vastus intermedius CSD decreased in both groups (EMS group: from 1.42 +/- 0.48 to 1.31 +/- 0.45 cm, P = 0.001 control group: from 1.59 +/- 0.53 to 1.37 +/- 0.5 cm, P = 0.002; EMS group: from 0.91 +/- 0.39 to 0.81 +/- 0.38 cm, P = 0.001 control group: from 1.40 +/- 0.64 to 1.11 +/- 0.56 cm, P = 0.004, respectively). However, the CSD of the right rectus femoris decreased significantly less in the EMS group (-0.11 +/- 0.06 cm, -8 +/- 3.9%) as compared to the control group (-0.21 +/- 0.10 cm, -13.9 +/- 6.4%; P < 0.05) and the CSD of the right vastus intermedius decreased significantly less in the EMS group (-0.10 +/- 0.05 cm, -12.5 +/- 7.4%) as compared to the control group (-0.29 +/- 0.28 cm, -21.5 +/- 15.3%; P < 0.05).

Conclusions: EMS is well tolerated and seems to preserve the muscle mass of critically ill patients. The potential use of EMS as a preventive and rehabilitation tool in ICU patients with polyneuromyopathy needs to be further investigated.

Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00882830.

Citing Articles

The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Muscle Proteolysis, Muscle Mass and Strength, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, Functional Activity, and Quality of Life in Post-Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Narrative Review.

Nazir A, Clementius B, Rafa H, Sakalia C, Nurhalizah H J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025; 18:983-994.

PMID: 39990638 PMC: 11847433. DOI: 10.2147/JMDH.S506069.


Acute Sarcopenia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on Its Incidence and Muscle Parameter Shifts During Hospitalisation.

Aldrich L, Ispoglou T, Prokopidis K, Alqallaf J, Wilson O, Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2024; 16(1):e13662.

PMID: 39690131 PMC: 11695106. DOI: 10.1002/jcsm.13662.


Treatment advances of sepsis‑induced myopathy (Review).

Xue Q, Zhang D, Zou J, Wang H, Shi R, Dong L Biomed Rep. 2024; 22(2):19.

PMID: 39651403 PMC: 11621912. DOI: 10.3892/br.2024.1897.


Evaluating Muscle Mass Changes in Critically Ill Patients: Rehabilitation Outcomes Measured by Ultrasound and Bioelectrical Impedance.

Kim M, Kim S, Ju Y, Ahn S, Lee S Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(21).

PMID: 39517341 PMC: 11544994. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12212128.


Functional Magnetic Neuromuscular Stimulation vs. Routine Physiotherapy in the Critically Ill for Prevention of ICU Acquired Muscle Loss: A Randomised Controlled Trial.

Skocir A, Jevsnik A, Plaskan L, Podbregar M Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(10).

PMID: 39459511 PMC: 11509331. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60101724.


References
1.
Plank L, Connolly A, Hill G . Sequential changes in the metabolic response in severely septic patients during the first 23 days after the onset of peritonitis. Ann Surg. 1998; 228(2):146-58. PMC: 1191454. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199808000-00002. View

2.
Schweickert W, Pohlman M, Pohlman A, Nigos C, Pawlik A, Esbrook C . Early physical and occupational therapy in mechanically ventilated, critically ill patients: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009; 373(9678):1874-82. PMC: 9906655. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60658-9. View

3.
Lin J, Fessell D, Jacobson J, Weadock W, Hayes C . An illustrated tutorial of musculoskeletal sonography: part I, introduction and general principles. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(3):637-45. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750637. View

4.
Ali N, OBrien Jr J, Hoffmann S, Phillips G, Garland A, Finley J . Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008; 178(3):261-8. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1829OC. View

5.
Gruther W, Benesch T, Zorn C, Paternostro-Sluga T, Quittan M, Fialka-Moser V . Muscle wasting in intensive care patients: ultrasound observation of the M. quadriceps femoris muscle layer. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40(3):185-9. DOI: 10.2340/16501977-0139. View