» Articles » PMID: 19812599

A TGFbeta-responsive Gene Signature is Associated with a Subset of Diffuse Scleroderma with Increased Disease Severity

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dermatology
Date 2009 Oct 9
PMID 19812599
Citations 81
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Systemic sclerosis is a complex disease with widespread skin fibrosis and variable visceral organ involvement. Since transforming growth factor-beta (TGFbeta) has been implicated in driving fibrosis in systemic sclerosis, a mechanism-derived gene expression signature was used to assay TGFbeta-responsive gene expression in the skin of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Primary dermal fibroblasts from patients with diffuse SSc (dSSc) and healthy controls were treated with TGFbeta, and the genome-wide gene expression was measured on DNA microarrays over a time course of 24 hours. Eight hundred and ninety-four probes representing 674 uniquely annotated genes were identified as TGFbeta responsive. Expression of the TGFbeta-responsive signature was examined in skin biopsies from 17 dSSc, seven limited SSc (lSSc), three morphea patients, and six healthy controls. The TGFbeta-responsive signature was expressed in 10 out of 17 dSSc skin biopsies, but was not found in lSSc, morphea, or healthy control biopsies. Expression of dSSC the TGFbeta-responsive signature stratifies patients into two major groups, one of which corresponds to the "diffuse-proliferation" intrinsic subset that showed higher modified Rodnan skin score and a higher likelihood of scleroderma lung disease. The TGFbeta-responsive signature is found in only a subset of dSSc patients who could be targeted by specific therapies.

Citing Articles

Noncanonical WNT5A controls the activation of latent TGF-β to drive fibroblast activation and tissue fibrosis.

Trinh-Minh T, Chen C, Tran Manh C, Li Y, Zhu H, Zhou X J Clin Invest. 2024; 134(10).

PMID: 38747285 PMC: 11093613. DOI: 10.1172/JCI159884.


Pharmacological inhibition of TAK1 prevents and induces regression of experimental organ fibrosis.

Bale S, Verma P, Yalavarthi B, Scarneo S, Hughes P, Amin M JCI Insight. 2023; 8(14).

PMID: 37306632 PMC: 10443806. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.165358.


Extracellular matrix stiffness-The central cue for skin fibrosis.

Wang K, Wen D, Xu X, Zhao R, Jiang F, Yuan S Front Mol Biosci. 2023; 10:1132353.

PMID: 36968277 PMC: 10031116. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2023.1132353.


Collagen V α1 Chain Decrease in Papillary Dermis from Early Systemic Sclerosis: A New Proposal in Cutaneous Fibrosis Molecular Structure.

de Morais J, Velosa A, Andrade P, Frediani D, Carrasco S, Queiroz Z Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(20).

PMID: 36293511 PMC: 9604101. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232012654.


A genomic meta-analysis of clinical variables and their association with intrinsic molecular subsets in systemic sclerosis.

Franks J, Toledo D, Martyanov V, Wang Y, Huang S, Wood T Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022; 62(1):19-28.

PMID: 35751592 PMC: 9788818. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/keac344.


References
1.
Varga J . Antifibrotic therapy in scleroderma: extracellular or intracellular targeting of activated fibroblasts?. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2004; 6(2):164-70. DOI: 10.1007/s11926-004-0062-8. View

2.
Barnett A, Miller M, Littlejohn G . The diagnosis and classification of scleroderma (systemic sclerosis). Postgrad Med J. 1988; 64(748):121-5. PMC: 2428791. DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.64.748.121. View

3.
Segal E, Shapira M, Regev A, Peer D, Botstein D, Koller D . Module networks: identifying regulatory modules and their condition-specific regulators from gene expression data. Nat Genet. 2003; 34(2):166-76. DOI: 10.1038/ng1165. View

4.
Leask A . Transcriptional profiling of the scleroderma fibroblast reveals a potential role for connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) in pathological fibrosis. Keio J Med. 2004; 53(2):74-7. DOI: 10.2302/kjm.53.74. View

5.
Barnett A, Miller M, Littlejohn G . A survival study of patients with scleroderma diagnosed over 30 years (1953-1983): the value of a simple cutaneous classification in the early stages of the disease. J Rheumatol. 1988; 15(2):276-83. View