Patient Factors in the Implementation of Decision Aids in General Practice: a Qualitative Study

Overview

Journal Health Expect

Publisher Wiley

Specialty Public Health

Date 2009 Oct 9

PMID 19811545

Citations 14

Authors

Vanita Bhavnani

Brian Fisher

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Decision aids (DAs) have been developed to help patients make treatment decisions. Research shows that they are effective in increasing patients' knowledge of treatment options without raising anxiety or conflict. However, they have not been routinely adopted for use in general practice in the UK and there are few reports addressing strategies to introduce them.

Objective: To examine patients' views about a variety of DAs for different conditions (heart disease, osteoporosis, osteoarthritis and breast cancer) in order to inform a strategy to introduce them into general practice.

Setting And Participants: General practice patients over the age of 18 years being or having been treated for one of the conditions above.

Methods: Qualitative study involving 12 focus groups with 77 patients evaluating decision aids relevant to their conditions. A semi-structured interview guide was used to generate discussions about the applicability of the DAs in routine general practice.

Results: Patients welcomed DAs for their educational and informational content. Reactions to the DAs were influenced by patients' own personal desires for involvement. The main concerns were that the use of DAs would potentially shift the onus of decision making responsibility on to the patient and about the practical challenges to implementation.

Conclusions: Clinicians will need to make explicit to patients that DAs are an adjunct to routine care and not a replacement, and therefore do not represent a derogation of responsibility. DAs need to be used as an integral part of the communication and support process for patients who want them.

Citing Articles

Mediation in Healthcare: Enhancing Conflict Resolution Between Patients and Physicians Beyond the Courtroom.

Dimitrov K, Miteva-Katrandzhieva T Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75487.

PMID: 39791044 PMC: 11717370. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75487.

Developing an implementation intervention, and identifying strategies for integrating health innovations in routine practice: A case study of the implementation of an insulin patient decision aid.

Tong W, Lee Y, Jenn Ng C, Lee P PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0310654.

PMID: 39546450 PMC: 11567623. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310654.

Exploring practice and perspectives on shared decision-making about osteoporosis medicines in Fracture Liaison Services: the iFraP development qualitative study.

Bullock L, Manning F, Hawarden A, Fleming J, Leyland S, Clark E Arch Osteoporos. 2024; 19(1):50.

PMID: 38898212 PMC: 11186902. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-024-01410-6.

What helps the successful implementation of digital decision aids supporting shared decision-making in cardiovascular diseases? A systematic review.

Peters L, Torres-Castano A, van Etten-Jamaludin F, Perestelo Perez L, Ubbink D Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2023; 4(1):53-62.

PMID: 36743877 PMC: 9890083. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztac070.

Stakeholder perspectives on the implementation of shared decision making to empower youth who have experienced commercial sexual exploitation.

Sahl S, Pontoriero M, Hill C, Knoepke C Child Youth Serv Rev. 2021; 122.

PMID: 34446975 PMC: 8386426. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105894.

References

Say R, Murtagh M, Thomson R . Patients' preference for involvement in medical decision making: a narrative review. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 60(2):102-14. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.003. View

Billings J . Promoting the dissemination of decision aids: an odyssey in a dysfunctional health care financing system. Health Aff (Millwood). 2004; Suppl Variation:VAR128-32. DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.var.128. View

Deyo R . A key medical decision maker: the patient. BMJ. 2001; 323(7311):466-7. PMC: 1121067. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.466. View

Sawka C, Goel V, Mahut C, Taylor G, Thiel E, OConnor A . Development of a patient decision aid for choice of surgical treatment for breast cancer. Health Expect. 2001; 1(1):23-36. PMC: 5081065. DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.1998.00003.x. View

OConnor A . Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 1995; 15(1):25-30. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X9501500105. View

Salkeld G, Solomon M, Short L, Butow P . A matter of trust--patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer. Health Expect. 2004; 7(2):104-14. PMC: 5060230. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00257.x. View

Fallowfield L, Hall A, Maguire P, Baum M, AHern R . Psychological effects of being offered choice of surgery for breast cancer. BMJ. 1994; 309(6952):448. PMC: 2540947. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.309.6952.448. View

Entwistle V . The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes. Health Expect. 2001; 4(2):109-15. PMC: 5060054. DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2001.00141.x. View

Davis R, Dolan G, Thomas S, Atwell C, Mead D, Nehammer S . Exploring doctor and patient views about risk communication and shared decision-making in the consultation. Health Expect. 2003; 6(3):198-207. PMC: 5060187. DOI: 10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00235.x. View

10.

Entwistle V, Watt I . Patient involvement in treatment decision-making: the case for a broader conceptual framework. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63(3):268-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2006.05.002. View

11.

Biley F . Some determinants that effect patient participation in decision-making about nursing care. J Adv Nurs. 1992; 17(4):414-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01924.x. View

12.

OCathain A, Thomas K . Evaluating decision aids--where next?. Health Expect. 2004; 7(2):98-103. PMC: 5060229. DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2004.00258.x. View

13.

Murray E, Davis H, Tai S, Coulter A, Gray A, Haines A . Randomised controlled trial of an interactive multimedia decision aid on hormone replacement therapy in primary care. BMJ. 2001; 323(7311):490-3. PMC: 48137. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.323.7311.490. View

14.

Elit L, Levine M, Gafni A, Whelan T, Doig G, Streiner D . Patients' preferences for therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: development, testing, and application of a bedside decision instrument. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 62(3):329-35. DOI: 10.1006/gyno.1996.0244. View

15.

Entwistle V, Prior M, Skea Z, Francis J . Involvement in treatment decision-making: its meaning to people with diabetes and implications for conceptualisation. Soc Sci Med. 2007; 66(2):362-75. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.09.001. View

16.

Legare F, OConnor A, Graham I, Wells G, Jacobsen M, Elmslie T . The effect of decision aids on the agreement between women's and physicians' decisional conflict about hormone replacement therapy. Patient Educ Couns. 2003; 50(2):211-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00129-5. View

17.

Hack T, Degner L, Dyck D . Relationship between preferences for decisional control and illness information among women with breast cancer: a quantitative and qualitative analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1994; 39(2):279-89. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)90336-0. View

18.

Henman M, Butow P, Brown R, Boyle F, Tattersall M . Lay constructions of decision-making in cancer. Psychooncology. 2002; 11(4):295-306. DOI: 10.1002/pon.566. View

19.

Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Entwistle V, Coulter A, OConnor A, ROVNER D . Patient choice modules for summaries of clinical effectiveness: a proposal. BMJ. 2001; 322(7287):664-7. PMC: 1119848. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7287.664. View

20.

Rostom A, OConnor A, Tugwell P, Wells G . A randomized trial of a computerized versus an audio-booklet decision aid for women considering post-menopausal hormone replacement therapy. Patient Educ Couns. 2002; 46(1):67-74. DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00167-7. View