» Articles » PMID: 19797698

Quantifying the Value of Stroke Disability Outcomes: WHO Global Burden of Disease Project Disability Weights for Each Level of the Modified Rankin Scale

Overview
Journal Stroke
Date 2009 Oct 3
PMID 19797698
Citations 73
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Purpose: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) categorizes poststroke disability among 7 broad, ordinal grades, but the interval distances between these levels are spaced along the disability spectrum have not been previously investigated.

Methods: We used the person trade-off procedure developed by the World Health Organization Global Burden of Disease Project (WHO-GBDP) to generate disability weights (DWs) ranging from 0 (normal) to 1 (dead) for each of 7 mRS grades. The ratings of an international, 9-member panel of stroke experts were combined by a modified Delphi process.

Results: DWs (95% CI) were 0 for mRS 0, 0.046 (0.004 to 0.088) for mRS 1, 0.212 (0.175 to 0.250) for mRS 2, 0.331 (0.292 to 0.371) for mRS 3, 0.652 (0.625 to 0.678) for mRS 4, 0.944 (0.873 to 1.015) for mRS 5, and 1.0 for mRS 6. DWs of adjacent mRS levels were significantly different (P<0.001 for all). Coefficients of variation showed a high degree of consensus for DWs among panel members. DWs placed each of the 5 intermediate mRS states in different disability class levels of the WHO-GBDP anchor conditions and identified natural clusters to use when reducing the mRS to fewer categories.

Conclusions: Formal DW assignment confirms that the mRS is an ordered but unequally spaced scale. The availability of DWs for each mRS level now permits direct comparison of each poststroke outcome state with the outcomes of hundreds of other diseases in the WHO-GBDP and the expression of stroke burden in different populations by using the uniform metric of disability-adjusted life-years lost.

Citing Articles

Thrombectomy for Stroke With Large Infarct on Noncontrast CT: The TESLA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yoo A, Zaidat O, Sheth S, Rai A, Ortega-Gutierrez S, Given 2nd C JAMA. 2024; .

PMID: 39374319 PMC: 11420819. DOI: 10.1001/jama.2024.13933.


Adjunctive Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide for Ischemic Stroke.

Adeoye O, Broderick J, Derdeyn C, Grotta J, Barsan W, Bentho O N Engl J Med. 2024; 391(9):810-820.

PMID: 39231343 PMC: 11528349. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2314779.


Treatment outcome of bridge mechanical thrombectomy with different IV-tPA dosages in the standard and extended time window in real-world practice.

Liu H, Deng W, Chang C, Wu Y, Wong H, Chang C Neuroradiol J. 2024; 38(1):87-92.

PMID: 39185692 PMC: 11571331. DOI: 10.1177/19714009241269447.


Using 30-day modified rankin scale score to predict 90-day score in patients with intracranial hemorrhage: Derivation and validation of prediction model.

Baker W, Sharma M, Cohen A, Ouwens M, Christoph M, Koch B PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0303757.

PMID: 38771834 PMC: 11108121. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303757.


Software with artificial intelligence-derived algorithms for analysing CT brain scans in people with a suspected acute stroke: a systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Westwood M, Ramaekers B, Grimm S, Armstrong N, Wijnen B, Ahmadu C Health Technol Assess. 2024; 28(11):1-204.

PMID: 38512017 PMC: 11017149. DOI: 10.3310/RDPA1487.


References
1.
Kleindorfer D, Broderick J, Khoury J, Flaherty M, Woo D, Alwell K . The unchanging incidence and case-fatality of stroke in the 1990s: a population-based study. Stroke. 2006; 37(10):2473-8. DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000242766.65550.92. View

2.
Nord E . Methods for quality adjustment of life years. Soc Sci Med. 1992; 34(5):559-69. DOI: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90211-8. View

3.
Solomon N, Glick H, Russo C, Lee J, Schulman K . Patient preferences for stroke outcomes. Stroke. 1994; 25(9):1721-5. DOI: 10.1161/01.str.25.9.1721. View

4.
Samsa G, Reutter R, Parmigiani G, Ancukiewicz M, Abrahamse P, Lipscomb J . Performing cost-effectiveness analysis by integrating randomized trial data with a comprehensive decision model: application to treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Clin Epidemiol. 1999; 52(3):259-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(98)00151-6. View

5.
Alexandrov A, Molina C, Grotta J, Garami Z, Ford S, Alvarez-Sabin J . Ultrasound-enhanced systemic thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2004; 351(21):2170-8. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa041175. View