Robotic Surgical Education: a Collaborative Approach to Training Postgraduate Urologists and Endourology Fellows
Overview
Affiliations
Objective: Currently, robotic training for inexperienced, practicing surgeons is primarily done vis-à-vis industry and/or society-sponsored day or weekend courses, with limited proctorship opportunities. The objective of this study was to assess the impact of an extended-proctorship program at up to 32 months of follow-up.
Methods: An extended-proctorship program for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was established at our institution. The curriculum consisted of 3 phases: (1) completing an Intuitive Surgical 2-day robotic training course with company representatives; (2) serving as assistant to a trained proctor on 5 to 6 cases; and (3) performing proctored cases up to 1 year until confidence was achieved. Participants were surveyed and asked to evaluate on a 5-point Likert scale their operative experience in robotics and satisfaction regarding their training.
Results: Nine of 9 participants are currently performing robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) independently. Graduates of our program have performed 477 RALP cases. The mean number of cases performed within phase 3 was 20.1 (range, 5 to 40) prior to independent practice. The program received a rating of 4.2/5 for effectiveness in teaching robotic surgery skills.
Conclusion: Our robotic program, with extended proctoring, has led to an outstanding take-rate for disseminating robotic skills in a metropolitan community.
Suggested robotic-assisted thoracic surgery training curriculum.
Al Zaidi M, Wright G, Yasufuku K J Thorac Dis. 2023; 15(2):791-798.
PMID: 36910116 PMC: 9992622. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-22-598.
Robot-assisted general surgery is safe during the learning curve: a 5-year Australian experience.
Nann S, Rana A, Karatassas A, Eteuati J, Tonkin D, McDonald C J Robot Surg. 2023; 17(4):1541-1546.
PMID: 36897528 PMC: 10374810. DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01560-8.
A Cross-Sectional Study of Resident Training in Robotic Surgery in India.
Darlington D, Anitha F, Joseph C Cureus. 2022; 14(2):e22162.
PMID: 35308716 PMC: 8923250. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.22162.
He B, Smet M, Sodhi M, Etminan M, Maberley D Eye (Lond). 2021; 35(12):3192-3201.
PMID: 34117390 PMC: 8602368. DOI: 10.1038/s41433-021-01599-7.
Should Robotic Surgery Simulation Be Introduced in the Core Surgical Training Curriculum?.
Bhakhri K, Harrison-Phipps K, Harling L, Routledge T Front Surg. 2021; 8:595203.
PMID: 33791334 PMC: 8006400. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.595203.