» Articles » PMID: 19788409

Prevalence of Urinary Incontinence and Its Association with Body Mass Index Among Women in Puerto Rico

Overview
Date 2009 Oct 1
PMID 19788409
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Urinary incontinence (UI) affects the quality of life of millions of women world-wide. Prevalence estimates for UI range from 10% to 40%, but information on young and mid-life women, especially among Hispanics, is limited. This study estimated UI prevalence and its association with body mass index (BMI) in a population-based sample of 276 female residents of Bayamón, Puerto Rico (PR) aged 21-64 years.

Methods: A cluster sampling design was employed. Women were interviewed to gather data on sociodemographic, clinical, gynecologic, and UI characteristics. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the study sample. Bivariate analyses of factors potentially associated with UI and BMI were conducted using generalized linear models (GLM). Multivariate GLM was used to determine the covariate adjusted association between BMI and UI.

Results: The prevalence of UI was 34.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 29.4-40.6%). Among women with UI, stress incontinence was most frequent (46.8%), followed by mixed (41.5%) and urge incontinence (11.7%). More than 45% of participants were either overweight (25 kg/m(2) <or= BMI <or= 29.9 kg/m(2)) or obese (BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2)). The adjusted analysis revealed that women with a BMI >or= 30 kg/m(2) had 1.96 (p = 0.06) times the probability of having UI compared to women with a BMI < 25 kg/m(2).

Conclusions: UI is a public health problem among this population, and obesity marginally increases the possibility of having this condition. Public health efforts should focus on reducing obesity in PR, in order to have an impact on UI morbidity.

Citing Articles

The relationship between increased regional body fat and overactive bladder: a population-based study.

Du Y, Hu H, Yang J, Yuan Q, Huang R, Dong Q J Health Popul Nutr. 2024; 43(1):226.

PMID: 39719652 PMC: 11669206. DOI: 10.1186/s41043-024-00725-x.


Prevalence of urinary incontinence in nulliparous Indian sportswomen.

Syeda F, Pandit U J Family Med Prim Care. 2024; 13(8):3270-3274.

PMID: 39228564 PMC: 11368332. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_282_24.


Urinary incontinence among urban and rural community dwelling older women: prevalence, risk factors and quality of life.

Murukesu R, Singh D, Shahar S BMC Public Health. 2019; 19(Suppl 4):529.

PMID: 31196015 PMC: 6565537. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6870-6.


The Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life of Women at Childbearing Age in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

A Bakarman M, Al-Ghamdi S Glob J Health Sci. 2015; 8(2):281-7.

PMID: 26383213 PMC: 4803930. DOI: 10.5539/gjhs.v8n2p281.


Epidemiology of stress urinary incontinence in women.

Reynolds W, Dmochowski R, Penson D Curr Urol Rep. 2011; 12(5):370-6.

PMID: 21720817 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-011-0206-0.


References
1.
. Research on the menopause in the 1990s. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1996; 866:1-107. View

2.
Townsend M, Danforth K, Rosner B, Curhan G, Resnick N, Grodstein F . Body mass index, weight gain, and incident urinary incontinence in middle-aged women. Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110(2 Pt 1):346-53. DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000270121.15510.57. View

3.
Subak L, Whitcomb E, Shen H, Saxton J, Vittinghoff E, Brown J . Weight loss: a novel and effective treatment for urinary incontinence. J Urol. 2005; 174(1):190-5. PMC: 1557356. DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000162056.30326.83. View

4.
Melville J, Katon W, Delaney K, Newton K . Urinary incontinence in US women: a population-based study. Arch Intern Med. 2005; 165(5):537-42. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.537. View

5.
Lambert D, Marceau S, Forse R . Intra-abdominal pressure in the morbidly obese. Obes Surg. 2005; 15(9):1225-32. DOI: 10.1381/096089205774512546. View