» Articles » PMID: 19785978

Adaptive Interventions May Optimize Outcomes in Drug Courts: a Pilot Study

Overview
Publisher Current Science
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Sep 30
PMID 19785978
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Adaptive interventions apply a priori decision rules for adjusting treatment services in response to participants' clinical presentation or performance in treatment. This pilot study (n = 30) experimentally examined an adaptive intervention in a misdemeanor drug court. The participants were primarily charged with possession of marijuana (73%) or possession of drug paraphernalia (23%). Results revealed that participants in the adaptive condition had higher graduation rates and required significantly less time to graduate from the program and achieve a final resolution of the case. It took an average of nearly 4 fewer months for participants in the adaptive intervention to resolve their cases compared with those participating in drug court as usual. Participants in the adaptive condition also reported equivalent satisfaction with the program and therapeutic alliances with their counselors. These data suggest that adaptive interventions may enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of drug courts and justify examining adaptive interventions in large-scale drug court studies.

Citing Articles

Interventions for female drug-using offenders.

Perry A, Martyn-St James M, Burns L, Hewitt C, Glanville J, Aboaja A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 12:CD010910.

PMID: 31834635 PMC: 6910124. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010910.pub3.


Interventions for drug-using offenders with co-occurring mental health problems.

Perry A, Martyn-St James M, Burns L, Hewitt C, Glanville J, Aboaja A Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 10:CD010901.

PMID: 31588993 PMC: 6778977. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010901.pub3.


Examining the use of visual performance feedback in drug treatment court.

Festinger D, Dugosh K, Della Porta J Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018; 26(1):85-93.

PMID: 29389171 PMC: 5843990. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000166.


Inference about the expected performance of a data-driven dynamic treatment regime.

Chakraborty B, Laber E, Zhao Y Clin Trials. 2014; 11(4):408-417.

PMID: 24925083 PMC: 4265005. DOI: 10.1177/1740774514537727.


The impact of drug treatment courts on recovery: a systematic review.

Wittouck C, Dekkers A, De Ruyver B, Vanderplasschen W, Vander Laenen F ScientificWorldJournal. 2013; 2013:493679.

PMID: 23576903 PMC: 3618932. DOI: 10.1155/2013/493679.


References
1.
Collins L, Murphy S, Bierman K . A conceptual framework for adaptive preventive interventions. Prev Sci. 2004; 5(3):185-96. PMC: 3544191. DOI: 10.1023/b:prev.0000037641.26017.00. View

2.
Marlowe D, Festinger D, Lee P, Dugosh K, Benasutti K . Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court. Crime Delinq. 2008; 52(1):52-76. PMC: 2174271. DOI: 10.1177/0011128705281746. View

3.
Kidorf M, Neufeld K, King V, Clark M, Brooner R . A stepped care approach for reducing cannabis use in opioid-dependent outpatients. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2007; 32(4):341-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2006.09.005. View

4.
Marlowe D, Festinger D, Foltz C, Lee P, Patapis N . Perceived deterrence and outcomes in drug court. Behav Sci Law. 2005; 23(2):183-98. DOI: 10.1002/bsl.636. View

5.
Marlowe D, Festinger D, Dugosh K, Lee P, Benasutti K . Adapting judicial supervision to the risk level of drug offenders: discharge and 6-month outcomes from a prospective matching study. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2006; 88 Suppl 2:S4-13. PMC: 1885231. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.10.001. View