» Articles » PMID: 19775912

Repeat Mammography Screening Among Unmarried Women with and Without a Disability

Overview
Date 2009 Sep 25
PMID 19775912
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: Unmarried women with disabilities may be a particularly vulnerable group for underutilization of repeat mammography screening. Our goal was to compare the breast cancer screening experiences of unmarried women with disabilities (WWD) versus women with no disabilities (WND), and determine whether these experiences are associated with adherence to repeat screening.

Methods: We conducted a matched cohort study of 93 WWD and 93 WND to compare mammography experiences by disability status, examine rates of repeat mammography by disability status, and identify factors that are associated with repeat mammography.

Results: WWD were less likely to be on-schedule than WND in univariable (54.8% vs. 71.0%; relative risk, 0.77; 95% confidence limits, 0.61, 0.97), but not multivariable, analyses. In multivariable analyses, there was a significant interaction between disability status and positive experiences as the reasons for returning to the same mammography facility. Among WND, repeat screening ranged from 59% to 86%, depending on the number of positive experiences endorsed (range, 1-5). In contrast, among WWD, screening rates were only 37% among those who did not report any positive experiences and increased to a maximum of 60% regardless of whether women endorsed one to four or all five positive experiences. Severity and type of disability were not associated with repeat screening.

Conclusion: WWD may be less likely than WND to remain on-schedule for mammography. WWD who do not report any positive experiences as reasons for returning to a mammography facility may be at particularly high risk of underutilization of screening.

Citing Articles

A Systematic Review to Evaluate the Barriers to Breast Cancer Screening in Women with Disability.

Almohammed H J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892994 PMC: 11172480. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113283.


Cancer Disparities Experienced by People with Disabilities.

Hughes R, Robinson-Whelen S, Knudson C Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(15).

PMID: 35954534 PMC: 9367955. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19159187.


'It's easier said than done': perspectives on mammography from women with intellectual disabilities.

Wilkinson J, Deis C, Bowen D, Bokhour B Ann Fam Med. 2011; 9(2):142-7.

PMID: 21403141 PMC: 3056862. DOI: 10.1370/afm.1231.

References
1.
Nosek M . The John Stanley Coulter lecture. Overcoming the odds: the health of women with physical disabilities in the United States. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000; 81(2):135-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90130-8. View

2.
Spiegelman D, Hertzmark E . Easy SAS calculations for risk or prevalence ratios and differences. Am J Epidemiol. 2005; 162(3):199-200. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwi188. View

3.
Balluz L, Ahluwalia I, Murphy W, Mokdad A, Giles W, Harris V . Surveillance for certain health behaviors among selected local areas--United States, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2004; 53(5):1-100. View

4.
Blustein J, Weiss L . The use of mammography by women aged 75 and older: factors related to health, functioning, and age. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998; 46(8):941-6. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb02746.x. View

5.
Schootman M, Fuortes L . Breast and cervical carcinoma: the correlation of activity limitations and rurality with screening, disease incidence, and mortality. Cancer. 1999; 86(6):1087-94. View