» Articles » PMID: 19755635

Invited Commentary: Causal Diagrams and Measurement Bias

Overview
Journal Am J Epidemiol
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Sep 17
PMID 19755635
Citations 80
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Causal inferences about the effect of an exposure on an outcome may be biased by errors in the measurement of either the exposure or the outcome. Measurement errors of exposure and outcome can be classified into 4 types: independent nondifferential, dependent nondifferential, independent differential, and dependent differential. Here the authors describe how causal diagrams can be used to represent these 4 types of measurement bias and discuss some problems that arise when using measured exposure variables (e.g., body mass index) to make inferences about the causal effects of unmeasured constructs (e.g., "adiposity"). The authors conclude that causal diagrams need to be used to represent biases arising not only from confounding and selection but also from measurement.

Citing Articles

The association between gestational diabetes and fear of childbirth: a longitudinal register study.

Savard J, Pauck Bernhardsen G, Mykkanen A, Keski-Nisula L, Lehto S BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):814.

PMID: 39696019 PMC: 11654169. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-07022-9.


Methods in causal inference. Part 1: causal diagrams and confounding.

Bulbulia J Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e40.

PMID: 39600624 PMC: 11588567. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.35.


Methods in causal inference. Part 3: measurement error and external validity threats.

Bulbulia J Evol Hum Sci. 2024; 6:e42.

PMID: 39600618 PMC: 11588564. DOI: 10.1017/ehs.2024.33.


Addressing Information Biases Within Electronic Health Record Data to Improve the Examination of Epidemiologic Associations With Diabetes Prevalence Among Young Adults: Cross-Sectional Study.

Conderino S, Anthopolos R, Albrecht S, Farley S, Divers J, Titus A JMIR Med Inform. 2024; 12:e58085.

PMID: 39353204 PMC: 11460830. DOI: 10.2196/58085.


How to develop causal directed acyclic graphs for observational health research: a scoping review.

Poppe L, Steen J, Loh W, Crombez G, De Block F, Jacobs N Health Psychol Rev. 2024; 19(1):45-65.

PMID: 39327907 PMC: 11875439. DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2024.2402809.


References
1.
VanderWeele T, Robins J . Signed directed acyclic graphs for causal inference. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2014; 72(1):111-127. PMC: 4239133. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2009.00728.x. View

2.
Dosemeci M, Wacholder S, Lubin J . Does nondifferential misclassification of exposure always bias a true effect toward the null value?. Am J Epidemiol. 1990; 132(4):746-8. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115716. View

3.
Robins J . Causal models for estimating the effects of weight gain on mortality. Int J Obes (Lond). 2008; 32 Suppl 3:S15-41. DOI: 10.1038/ijo.2008.83. View

4.
Hernan M, Hernandez-Diaz S, Werler M, Mitchell A . Causal knowledge as a prerequisite for confounding evaluation: an application to birth defects epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol. 2002; 155(2):176-84. DOI: 10.1093/aje/155.2.176. View

5.
Robins J . Data, design, and background knowledge in etiologic inference. Epidemiology. 2001; 12(3):313-20. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200105000-00011. View