Hemodynamic Differences Between Carvedilol and Labetalol in the Cutaneous Circulation
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The effects of labetalol and carvedilol on local cutaneous microvascular perfusion and calculated local cutaneous microvascular resistance were investigated in anesthetized rats at submaximal doses that produced equivalent reductions in blood pressure and heart rate. Labetalol decreased cutaneous perfusion (-25% +/- 3%) without significantly affecting cutaneous vascular resistance (-6% +/- 3%). In marked contrast, carvedilol dramatically increased cutaneous perfusion (+64% +/- 9%) and significantly reduced cutaneous vascular resistance (-57% +/- 3%). These results suggest that carvedilol and labetalol possess differences in the mechanisms by which they produce vasodilation in vivo.
Dunn C, Lea A, Wagstaff A Drugs. 1997; 54(1):161-85.
PMID: 9211087 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199754010-00015.
A risk-benefit assessment of carvedilol in the treatment of cardiovascular disorders.
Louis W, Krum H, Conway E Drug Saf. 1994; 11(2):86-93.
PMID: 7946002 DOI: 10.2165/00002018-199411020-00003.
Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of carvedilol.
Morgan T Clin Pharmacokinet. 1994; 26(5):335-46.
PMID: 7914479 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-199426050-00002.
McTavish D, Sorkin E Drugs. 1993; 45(2):232-58.
PMID: 7681374 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-199345020-00006.
Long-term hemodynamic effects of antihypertensive treatment.
Lund-Johansen P, Omvik P, Nordrehaug J Clin Investig. 1992; 70 Suppl 1:S58-64.
PMID: 1350486 DOI: 10.1007/BF00207613.