» Articles » PMID: 19744720

Comparison and Evaluation of Ocular Biometry Using a New Noncontact Optical Low-coherence Reflectometer

Overview
Journal Ophthalmology
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2009 Sep 12
PMID 19744720
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate a new high-resolution noncontact biometer (Lenstar; Haag-Streit AG, Koeniz, Switzerland) using optical low-coherence reflectometry and to compare the clinical measurements with those obtained from the IOLMaster (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany) and the Pachmumeter (Haag-Streit AG).

Design: Exploratory evaluation of diagnostic technology and nonrandomized, prospective clinical trial.

Participants: Eighty subjects (144 eyes) aged 20 to 90 years with cataractous, pseudophakic, aphakic, silicon oil-filled, or normal eyes.

Methods: Measurements of axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD), central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal radius (R1 [flattest radius of corneal curvature] and R2 [steep radius, 90 degrees apart from R1]), and axis of the flattest radius (Ax1) obtained with the Lenstar were compared with those obtained with the IOLMaster or Pachmumeter. The results were evaluated using Bland-Altman analyses. The differences between both methods were assessed using the paired t test, and its correlation was evaluated by Pearson coefficient.

Main Outcome Measures: Axial length, CCT, ACD, R1, R2, and Ax1.

Results: The overall mean AL measured with the Lenstar and the IOLMaster was 24.1 mm (r = 0.999). Anterior chamber depth was 3.19 mm (Lenstar) and 3.17 mm (IOLMaster; r = 0.875). Excellent correlations also were found for the corneal radius and the axis of flattest radius (R1, r = 0.927; R2, r = 0.929; and Ax1, r = 0.938). Mean CCT was 0.557 mm (r = 0.978) for both Lenstar and Pachmumeter.

Conclusions: Measurements with the new Lenstar correlated well with those with the IOLMaster and Pachmumeter in cataractous, pseudophakic, aphakic, silicon oil-filled, and normal eyes. It is an accurate, fast instrument that provides additional information of interest to any cataract or refractive surgeon.

Citing Articles

Optimization of biometry for best refractive outcome in cataract surgery.

Gupta V, Pal H, Sawhney S, Aggarwal A, Vanathi M, Luthra G Indian J Ophthalmol. 2023; 72(1):29-43.

PMID: 38131567 PMC: 10841781. DOI: 10.4103/IJO.IJO_1219_23.


Pattern of astigmatism using partial coherence interferometry in patients of different age groups undergoing cataract surgery.

Vats S, Kumari L, Goenka R, Agrawal M, Mishra S Oman J Ophthalmol. 2023; 15(3):295-298.

PMID: 36760961 PMC: 9905882. DOI: 10.4103/ojo.ojo_345_21.


Comparing low-coherence interferometry and A-scan ultrasonography in measuring ocular axial dimensions in young rhesus monkeys.

She Z, Hung L, Beach K, Arumugam B, Smith 3rd E, Ostrin L Exp Eye Res. 2022; 217:108937.

PMID: 35074342 PMC: 8957592. DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2022.108937.


Prevalence of Astigmatism in Patients Undergoing Cataract Surgery at a Tertiary Care Center in North India.

Sharma A, Phulke S, Agrawal A, Kapoor I, Bansal R Clin Ophthalmol. 2021; 15:617-622.

PMID: 33628007 PMC: 7897979. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S291467.


Influence of measurement differences of anterior chamber depth and axial length on lens thickness evaluation in cataract patients: a comparison of two tests.

Xu J, Li C, Wang L, Li C, Li X, Lu P BMC Ophthalmol. 2020; 20(1):481.

PMID: 33287752 PMC: 7720484. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-020-01754-w.