» Articles » PMID: 19734882

Selective Epigenetic Control of Retrotransposition in Arabidopsis

Overview
Journal Nature
Specialty Science
Date 2009 Sep 8
PMID 19734882
Citations 165
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Retrotransposons are mobile genetic elements that populate chromosomes, where the host largely controls their activities. In plants and mammals, retrotransposons are transcriptionally silenced by DNA methylation, which in Arabidopsis is propagated at CG dinucleotides by METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1). In met1 mutants, however, mobilization of retrotransposons is not observed, despite their transcriptional activation. A post-transcriptional mechanism therefore seems to be preventing retrotransposition. Here we show that a copia-type retrotransposon (Evadé, French for 'fugitive') evaded suppression of its movement during inbreeding of hybrid epigenomes consisting of met1- and wild-type-derived chromosomes. Evadé (EVD) reinsertions caused a series of developmental mutations that allowed its identification. Genetic testing of host control of the EVD life cycle showed that transcriptional suppression occurred by CG methylation supported by RNA-directed DNA methylation. On transcriptional reactivation, subsequent steps of the EVD cycle were inhibited by plant-specific RNA polymerase IV/V and the histone methyltransferase KRYPTONITE (KYP). Moreover, genome resequencing demonstrated retrotransposition of EVD but no other potentially active retroelements when this combination of epigenetic mechanisms was compromised. Our results demonstrate that epigenetic control of retrotransposons extends beyond transcriptional suppression and can be individualized for particular elements.

Citing Articles

Centrophilic retrotransposon integration via CENH3 chromatin in Arabidopsis.

Tsukahara S, Bousios A, Perez-Roman E, Yamaguchi S, Leduque B, Nakano A Nature. 2025; 637(8046):744-748.

PMID: 39743586 PMC: 11735389. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08319-7.


Characterization of radiations-induced genomic structural variations in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Sall S, Alioua A, Staerck S, Graindorge S, Pellicioli M, Schuler J Plant J. 2024; 121(1):e17180.

PMID: 39616610 PMC: 11712536. DOI: 10.1111/tpj.17180.


PTGS is dispensable for the initiation of epigenetic silencing of an active transposon in Arabidopsis.

Trasser M, Bohl-Viallefond G, Barragan-Borrero V, Diezma-Navas L, Loncsek L, Nordborg M EMBO Rep. 2024; 25(12):5780-5809.

PMID: 39511423 PMC: 11624286. DOI: 10.1038/s44319-024-00304-5.


Epigenetic responses of trees to environmental stress in the context of climate change.

Miryeganeh M, Armitage D Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024; 100(1):131-148.

PMID: 39192567 PMC: 11718629. DOI: 10.1111/brv.13132.


Transposition of HOPPLA in siRNA-deficient plants suggests a limited effect of the environment on retrotransposon mobility in Brachypodium distachyon.

Thieme M, Minadakis N, Himber C, Keller B, Xu W, Rutowicz K PLoS Genet. 2024; 20(3):e1011200.

PMID: 38470914 PMC: 10959353. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1011200.


References
1.
Reinders J, Delucinge Vivier C, Theiler G, Chollet D, Descombes P, Paszkowski J . Genome-wide, high-resolution DNA methylation profiling using bisulfite-mediated cytosine conversion. Genome Res. 2008; 18(3):469-76. PMC: 2259111. DOI: 10.1101/gr.7073008. View

2.
. Analysis of the genome sequence of the flowering plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature. 2000; 408(6814):796-815. DOI: 10.1038/35048692. View

3.
Jackson J, Lindroth A, Cao X, Jacobsen S . Control of CpNpG DNA methylation by the KRYPTONITE histone H3 methyltransferase. Nature. 2002; 416(6880):556-60. DOI: 10.1038/nature731. View

4.
Ding Y, Wang X, Su L, Zhai J, Cao S, Zhang D . SDG714, a histone H3K9 methyltransferase, is involved in Tos17 DNA methylation and transposition in rice. Plant Cell. 2007; 19(1):9-22. PMC: 1820975. DOI: 10.1105/tpc.106.048124. View

5.
Kanno T, Bucher E, Daxinger L, Huettel B, Bohmdorfer G, Gregor W . A structural-maintenance-of-chromosomes hinge domain-containing protein is required for RNA-directed DNA methylation. Nat Genet. 2008; 40(5):670-5. DOI: 10.1038/ng.119. View