Sweat Gland Bioelectrics Differ in Cystic Fibrosis: a New Concept for Potential Diagnosis and Assessment of CFTR Function in Cystic Fibrosis
Overview
Affiliations
Background: For nearly 50 years the diagnosis of cystic fibrosis (CF) has depended on measurements of sweat chloride concentration. While the validity of this test is universally accepted, increasing diagnostic challenges and the search for adequate biomarker assays to support curative-orientated clinical drug trials have created a new demand for accurate, reliable and more practical CF tests. A novel concept is proposed that may provide a more efficient real-time method for assessing CFTR function in vivo.
Methods: Cholinergic and beta-adrenergic agonists were iontophoresed to stimulate sweating. The bioelectric potential from stimulated sweat glands (SPD) was measured in vivo using a standard ECG electrode applied to the skin surface. SPD and sweat chloride concentrations were compared in cohorts predicted to express a range of CFTR function as presented by healthy controls (HC), heterozygotes (Hz), pancreatic sufficient (CFPS) and pancreatic insufficient patients with CF (CFPI).
Results: The median SPD was hyperpolarized in patients with CF compared with control subjects (-47.4 mV vs -14.5 mV, p<0.001). In distinguishing between control and CF subjects, SPD (area under receiver operator curve (AUC) = 0.997) was similar to sweat chloride concentration (AUC = 0.986). Sequential cholinergic/beta-adrenergic sweat stimulation dramatically depolarised the SPD in patients with CF (p<0.001) but had no effect in control subjects (p = 0.6) or on the sweat chloride concentration in either group (p>0.5). Furthermore, the positive SPD response was larger in CFPI than in CFPS subjects (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: These results support the concept that skin surface voltages arising from stimulated sweat glands can be exploited to assess expressed CFTR function in vivo and may prove to be a useful diagnostic tool.
Zampoli M, Verstraete J, Nguyen-Khoa T, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Zar H, Gonska T Pediatr Pulmonol. 2022; 58(1):187-196.
PMID: 36193559 PMC: 10092537. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.26179.
The molecular evolution of function in the CFTR chloride channel.
Infield D, Strickland K, Gaggar A, McCarty N J Gen Physiol. 2021; 153(12).
PMID: 34647973 PMC: 8640958. DOI: 10.1085/jgp.202012625.
Toward inclusive therapy with CFTR modulators: Progress and challenges.
Guimbellot J, Sharma J, Rowe S Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017; 52(S48):S4-S14.
PMID: 28881097 PMC: 6208153. DOI: 10.1002/ppul.23773.
Servidoni M, Souza Gomez C, Marson F, Toro A, Goncalves de Oliveira Ribeiro M, Ribeiro J J Bras Pneumol. 2017; 43(2):121-128.
PMID: 28538779 PMC: 5474375. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-37562016000000076.
Noninvasive metabolic profiling for painless diagnosis of human diseases and disorders.
Mal M Future Sci OA. 2016; 2(2):FSO106.
PMID: 28031956 PMC: 5137983. DOI: 10.4155/fsoa-2015-0014.