» Articles » PMID: 19732562

Stability of the Factor Structure of the Metabolic Syndrome Across Pubertal Development: Confirmatory Factor Analyses of Three Alternative Models

Overview
Journal J Pediatr
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2009 Sep 8
PMID 19732562
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test the fit and stability of 3 alternative models of the metabolic syndrome's factor structure across 3 developmental stages.

Study Design: With data from the Fels Longitudinal Study, confirmatory factor analyses tested 3 alternative models of the factor structure underlying relationships among 8 metabolic syndrome-associated risks. Models tested were a 1-factor model (A), a 4-factor model (B), and a second-order latent factor model (C). Developmental stages assessed were prepuberty (ages 8-10), puberty (ages 11-15), and postpuberty (ages 16-20).

Results: Convergence was achieved for all developmental stages for model A, but the fit was poor throughout (root mean square error of approximation > 0.1). Standardized factor loadings for waist circumference and body mass index were much stronger than those for fasting insulin at all 3 time points. Although prepuberty and postpuberty models converged for models B and C, each model had problems with Heywood cases. The puberty model did not converge for either model B or C.

Conclusions: The hypothetical structures commonly used to support the metabolic syndrome concept do not provide adequate fit in a pediatric sample and may be variable by maturation stage. A components-based approach to cardiovascular risk reduction, with emphasis on obesity prevention and control, may be a more appropriate clinical strategy for children and youth than a syndromic approach.

Citing Articles

Cardiovascular risk factors and its patterns of change between 4 and 8 years of age in the INMA-Asturias cohort.

Fernandez-Iglesias R, Fernandez-Somoano A, Rodriguez-Dehli C, Venta-Obaya R, Riano-Galan I, Tardon A PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283799.

PMID: 37043453 PMC: 10096221. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283799.


Asthma and high-intensity interval training have no effect on clustered cardiometabolic risk or arterial stiffness in adolescents.

McNarry M, Lester L, Ellins E, Halcox J, Davies G, Winn C Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021; 121(7):1967-1978.

PMID: 33778908 PMC: 8192411. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-020-04590-4.


Cardiometabolic Risk Variables in Preadolescent Children: A Factor Analysis.

Stoner L, Weatherall M, Skidmore P, Castro N, Lark S, Faulkner J J Am Heart Assoc. 2017; 6(10).

PMID: 29021277 PMC: 5721889. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.007071.


An 8-Year Prospective Study of Depressive Symptoms and Change in Insulin From Adolescence to Young Adulthood.

Shomaker L, Goodman E Psychosom Med. 2015; 77(8):938-45.

PMID: 26368574 PMC: 4658292. DOI: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000230.


The Relationship Between Physical Activity and the Metabolic Syndrome Score in Children.

Dubose K, McKune A, Brophy P, Geyer G, Hickner R Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2015; 27(3):364-71.

PMID: 25902555 PMC: 4689590. DOI: 10.1123/pes.2014-0134.


References
1.
Goodman E . Metabolic syndrome and the mismeasure of risk. J Adolesc Health. 2008; 42(6):538-40. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2008.03.011. View

2.
Meigs J . Invited commentary: insulin resistance syndrome? Syndrome X? Multiple metabolic syndrome? A syndrome at all? Factor analysis reveals patterns in the fabric of correlated metabolic risk factors. Am J Epidemiol. 2000; 152(10):908-11; discussion 912. DOI: 10.1093/aje/152.10.908. View

3.
Shah S, Novak S, Stapleton L . Evaluation and comparison of models of metabolic syndrome using confirmatory factor analysis. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006; 21(5):343-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10654-006-9004-2. View

4.
Shen B, Todaro J, Niaura R, McCaffery J, Zhang J, Spiro 3rd A . Are metabolic risk factors one unified syndrome? Modeling the structure of the metabolic syndrome X. Am J Epidemiol. 2003; 157(8):701-11. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwg045. View

5.
Kahn R, Buse J, Ferrannini E, Stern M . The metabolic syndrome: time for a critical appraisal: joint statement from the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2005; 28(9):2289-304. DOI: 10.2337/diacare.28.9.2289. View