» Articles » PMID: 19730959

LMA Supreme Versus Facemask Ventilation Performed by Novices: a Comparative Study in Morbidly Obese Patients Showing Difficult Ventilation Predictors

Overview
Journal Obes Surg
Date 2009 Sep 5
PMID 19730959
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We designed a study to compare ventilation characteristics performed in morbidly obese patients by medical students via the facemask to that via the LMA Supreme.

Methods: This prospective, randomized, crossover study included 31 ASA I-III morbidly patients showing difficult mask ventilation predictors. After induction of anesthesia, ten medical students with no previous clinical experience in airway management, clinically educated to facemask ventilation maneuvers, and theoretically educated to laryngeal mask use were supervised by a senior anesthesiologist during performance of 60 s facemask and LMA Supreme ventilation in a randomly assigned order. Ventilation quality and difficulty were measured using an original score calculated as the sum of seven indicators (0=no ventilation and complications, 12=optimal and safe ventilation) and a visual analog scale (VAS; 0=no difficult-100=impossible), respectively. Values are presented as means (standard deviation) or medians [extremes].

Results: Mean age and body mass index of the patients were 39 years (12 years) and 44 kg m(-2) (7 kg m(-2)), respectively. One patient was excluded because of ventilation difficulty experienced by the senior anesthesiologist. Medical students successfully established ventilation with the LMA Supreme in all the 30 patients after a delay of 21 s (9 s) compared to 34 s (14 s) with the facemask (P<0.05). Failure of ventilation occurred in four patients with the facemask. Ventilation quality score was superior and ventilation difficulty (VAS 0-100) was inferior with the LMA Supreme than with the facemask (11 [10-12] and 9 [0-45] versus 5 [1-12] and 50 [5-100]); both P<0.05, respectively.

Conclusions: We showed that the LMA Supreme placed in novice hands systematically promoted easier ventilation of better quality than the facemask in morbidly obese patients showing difficult mask ventilation predictors. Our data suggest that the LMA Supreme could be considered as a standard airway management tool for both elective and rescue airway management of morbidly obese patients.

Citing Articles

Supraglottic airway devices: a powerful strategy in airway management.

Zhang K, Zhou M, Zou Z, Zhu C, Jiang R Am J Cancer Res. 2024; 14(1):16-32.

PMID: 38323274 PMC: 10839323.


Safety, Efficacy, and Ease of Insertion of Gnana Laryngeal Airway (GLA-4): A Prospective Clinical Study Utilizing the Unique Laryngeal Mask Airway With a Suction Tubing.

Ahmadzadeh S, Singh N, Sharpe M, Patel H, Lavespere G, Spillers N Cureus. 2024; 15(11):e49735.

PMID: 38161836 PMC: 10757590. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.49735.


Supraglottic Airway Devices with Vision Guided Systems: Third Generation of Supraglottic Airway Devices.

Castillo-Monzon C, Gaszynski T, Marroquin-Valz H, Orozco-Montes J, Ratajczyk P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(16).

PMID: 37629238 PMC: 10455808. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12165197.


Efficacy of Laryngeal Tube versus Bag Mask Ventilation by Inexperienced Providers.

Hart D, Driver B, Kartha G, Reardon R, Miner J West J Emerg Med. 2020; 21(3):688-693.

PMID: 32421521 PMC: 7234713. DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2020.3.45844.


Supraglottic airway devices in airway management of obese patients.

Singh M J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 35(4):546-547.

PMID: 31920243 PMC: 6939553. DOI: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_271_19.


References
1.
. 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Part 4: Advanced life support. Resuscitation. 2005; 67(2-3):213-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2005.09.018. View

2.
Kheterpal S, Han R, Tremper K, Shanks A, Tait A, OReilly M . Incidence and predictors of difficult and impossible mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2006; 105(5):885-91. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200611000-00007. View

3.
Langeron O, Masso E, HURAUX C, Guggiari M, Bianchi A, Coriat P . Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000; 92(5):1229-36. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00009. View

4.
Combes X, Le Roux B, Suen P, Dumerat M, Motamed C, Sauvat S . Unanticipated difficult airway in anesthetized patients: prospective validation of a management algorithm. Anesthesiology. 2004; 100(5):1146-50. DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200405000-00016. View

5.
Wharton N, Gibbison B, Gabbott D, Haslam G, Muchatuta N, Cook T . I-gel insertion by novices in manikins and patients. Anaesthesia. 2008; 63(9):991-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05542.x. View