» Articles » PMID: 1972638

Cardiovascular and Muscle Tone Changes Produced by Microinjection of Cholinergic and Glutamatergic Agonists in Dorsolateral Pons and Medial Medulla

Overview
Journal Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 1990 Apr 23
PMID 1972638
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cardiovascular and muscle responses to L-glutamic acid (Glut) and cholinergic agonists injected into the dorsolateral pontine tegmentum and medial medullary reticular formation (MMRF) were examined in unanesthetized, decerebrated cats. Glut, or cholinergic agonists acetylcholine (ACh) or carbachol (Carb), were injected into pons and MMRF at sites from which electrical stimulation produced bilateral suppression of muscle tone. Glut injection in MMRF produced hypotension without change in heart rate at doses as low as 1 mM. At higher doses (0.1-0.4 M), Glut induced hypotension with bradycardia in 23 out of 40 injections in both pons and MMRF. High concentrations of microinjected Glut decreased muscle tone or produced complete atonia in pons and rostral MMRF. Both N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptor blockers attenuated or completely blocked the cardiovascular response, while only non-NMDA antagonists blocked muscle inhibition to Glut injection. Microinjection of cholinergic agonists produced consistent hypotension in all of the injections in pons and MMRF, however, the heart rate response was variable with increase (27/42), decrease (2/42), or no change (13/42) in rate seen. Cholinergic injection produced muscle atonia in pons and caudal MMRF but not in rostral MMRF. Both muscle and cardiovascular responses were blocked by atropine but not by hexamethonium. The time course of muscle atonia and cardiovascular change differed in most of the experiments. We conclude that muscle tone suppression and cardiovascular response to Glut or cholinergic agonists use different receptor mechanisms and possibly different neurons. However, the co-localization of these mechanisms suggests that neuronal networks in the medial medulla and dorsolateral pons coordinate motor and cardiovascular responses.

Citing Articles

A Review of Sleep and Its Disorders in Patients with Parkinson's Disease in Relation to Various Brain Structures.

French I, Muthusamy K Front Aging Neurosci. 2016; 8:114.

PMID: 27242523 PMC: 4876118. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2016.00114.


Movement- and behavioral state-dependent activity of pontine reticulospinal neurons.

Thankachan S, Fuller P, Lu J Neuroscience. 2012; 221:125-39.

PMID: 22796072 PMC: 3424299. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.06.069.


Brainstem mechanisms of paradoxical (REM) sleep generation.

Luppi P, Clement O, Sapin E, Peyron C, Gervasoni D, Leger L Pflugers Arch. 2011; 463(1):43-52.

PMID: 22083642 DOI: 10.1007/s00424-011-1054-y.


REM sleep: a biological and psychological paradox.

Siegel J Sleep Med Rev. 2011; 15(3):139-42.

PMID: 21482156 PMC: 3091378. DOI: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.001.


The neurobiology of sleep.

Siegel J Semin Neurol. 2009; 29(4):277-96.

PMID: 19742406 PMC: 8809119. DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1237118.


References
1.
Holstege G, Kuypers H, Boer R . Anatomical evidence for direct brain stem projections to the somatic motoneuronal cell groups and autonomic preganglionic cell groups in cat spinal cord. Brain Res. 1979; 171(2):329-33. DOI: 10.1016/0006-8993(79)90337-8. View

2.
Amendt K, Czachurski J, Dembowsky K, SELLER H . Bulbospinal projections to the intermediolateral cell column: a neuroanatomical study. J Auton Nerv Syst. 1979; 1(1):103-7. DOI: 10.1016/0165-1838(79)90009-2. View

3.
Coote J, Downman C . Supraspinal control of reflex activity in renal nerves. J Physiol. 1969; 202(1):161-70. PMC: 1351471. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1969.sp008801. View

4.
AMOROSO E, BELL F, Rosenberg H . The relationship of the vasomotor and respiratory regions in the medulla oblongata of the sheep. J Physiol. 1954; 126(1):86-95. PMC: 1365643. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005194. View

5.
TABER E . The cytoarchitecture of the brain stem of the cat. I. Brain stem nuclei of cat. J Comp Neurol. 1961; 116:27-69. DOI: 10.1002/cne.901160104. View