» Articles » PMID: 19725973

Comparative Genomics of Chondrichthyan Hoxa Clusters

Overview
Journal BMC Evol Biol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Sep 4
PMID 19725973
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The chondrichthyan or cartilaginous fish (chimeras, sharks, skates and rays) occupy an important phylogenetic position as the sister group to all other jawed vertebrates and as an early lineage to diverge from the vertebrate lineage following two whole genome duplication events in vertebrate evolution. There have been few comparative genomic analyses incorporating data from chondrichthyan fish and none comparing genomic information from within the group. We have sequenced the complete Hoxa cluster of the Little Skate (Leucoraja erinacea) and compared to the published Hoxa cluster of the Horn Shark (Heterodontus francisci) and to available data from the Elephant Shark (Callorhinchus milii) genome project.

Results: A BAC clone containing the full Little Skate Hoxa cluster was fully sequenced and assembled. Analyses of coding sequences and conserved non-coding elements reveal a strikingly high level of conservation across the cartilaginous fish, with twenty ultraconserved elements (100%,100 bp) found between Skate and Horn Shark, compared to three between human and marsupials. We have also identified novel potential non-coding RNAs in the Skate BAC clone, some of which are conserved to other species.

Conclusion: We find that the Little Skate Hoxa cluster is remarkably similar to the previously published Horn Shark Hoxa cluster with respect to sequence identity, gene size and intergenic distance despite over 180 million years of separation between the two lineages. We suggest that the genomes of cartilaginous fish are more highly conserved than those of tetrapods or teleost fish and so are more likely to have retained ancestral non-coding elements. While useful for isolating homologous DNA, this complicates bioinformatic approaches to identify chondrichthyan-specific non-coding DNA elements.

Citing Articles

Elasmobranch genome sequencing reveals evolutionary trends of vertebrate karyotype organization.

Yamaguchi K, Uno Y, Kadota M, Nishimura O, Nozu R, Murakumo K Genome Res. 2023; 33(9):1527-1540.

PMID: 37591668 PMC: 10620051. DOI: 10.1101/gr.276840.122.


Little skate genome provides insights into genetic programs essential for limb-based locomotion.

Yoo D, Park J, Lee C, Song I, Lee Y, Yun T Elife. 2022; 11.

PMID: 36288084 PMC: 9605692. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.78345.


Persistence of the ABCC6 genes and the emergence of the bony skeleton in vertebrates.

Parreira B, Cardoso J, Costa R, Couto A, Bruges-Armas J, Power D Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):6027.

PMID: 29662086 PMC: 5902450. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-24370-7.


The Ancient Origins of Neural Substrates for Land Walking.

Jung H, Baek M, DElia K, Boisvert C, Currie P, Tay B Cell. 2018; 172(4):667-682.e15.

PMID: 29425489 PMC: 5808577. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.01.013.


SkateBase, an elasmobranch genome project and collection of molecular resources for chondrichthyan fishes.

Wyffels J, King B, Vincent J, Chen C, Wu C, Polson S F1000Res. 2014; 3:191.

PMID: 25309735 PMC: 4184313. DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.4996.1.


References
1.
Fried C, Prohaska S, Stadler P . Exclusion of repetitive DNA elements from gnathostome Hox clusters. J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2004; 302(2):165-73. DOI: 10.1002/jez.b.20007. View

2.
Hornstein E, Mansfield J, Yekta S, Hu J, Harfe B, McManus M . The microRNA miR-196 acts upstream of Hoxb8 and Shh in limb development. Nature. 2005; 438(7068):671-4. DOI: 10.1038/nature04138. View

3.
Mungpakdee S, Seo H, Angotzi A, Dong X, Akalin A, Chourrout D . Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters. Mol Biol Evol. 2008; 25(7):1333-43. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msn097. View

4.
Di-Poi N, Montoya-Burgos J, Duboule D . Atypical relaxation of structural constraints in Hox gene clusters of the green anole lizard. Genome Res. 2009; 19(4):602-10. PMC: 2665779. DOI: 10.1101/gr.087932.108. View

5.
Hoegg S, Meyer A . Hox clusters as models for vertebrate genome evolution. Trends Genet. 2005; 21(8):421-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2005.06.004. View