» Articles » PMID: 19720612

Assessment of Procedural Skills in Anaesthesia

Overview
Journal Br J Anaesth
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 2009 Sep 2
PMID 19720612
Citations 47
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A key aspect of the practice of anaesthesia is the ability to perform practical procedures efficiently and safely. Decreased working hours during training, an increasing focus on patient safety, and greater accountability have resulted in a paradigm shift in medical education. The resulting international trend towards competency-based training demands robust methods of evaluation of all domains of learning. The assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia is poor compared with other domains of learning and has fallen behind surgical fields. Logbooks and procedure lists are best suited to providing information regarding likely opportunities within training programmes. Retrospective global scoring and direct observation without specific criteria are unreliable. The current best evidence for a gold standard for assessment of procedural skills in anaesthesia consists of a combination of previously validated checklists and global rating scales, used prospectively by a trained observer, for a procedure performed in an actual patient. Future research should include core assessment parameters to ensure methodological rigor and facilitate robust comparisons with other studies: (i) reliability, (ii) validity, (iii) feasibility, (iv) cost-effectiveness, and (v) comprehensiveness with varying levels of difficulty. Simulation may become a key part of the future of formative and summative skills assessment in anaesthesia; however, research is required to develop and test simulators that are realistic enough to be suitable for use in high-stakes evaluation.

Citing Articles

Gastric ultrasound performance time and difficulty: a prospective observational study.

Filipovic M, Baettig S, Hebeisen M, Meierhans R, Ganter M Anaesthesia. 2024; 80(2):161-169.

PMID: 39544015 PMC: 11726264. DOI: 10.1111/anae.16472.


Evaluation of a 12-hole clock model for improving bronchoscopic skills in simulated normal and difficult airways among anesthesia residents: A randomized controlled study.

Zhou Z, Zhang K, Zhao X, Hu Y, He Y, Wan L Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(23):e38510.

PMID: 38847658 PMC: 11155588. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038510.


Difficult airway simulation-based training for anaesthesiologists: efficacy and skills retention within six months.

Bielka K, Kuchyn I, Fomina H, Khomenko O, Kyselova I, Frank M BMC Anesthesiol. 2024; 24(1):44.

PMID: 38297196 PMC: 10829367. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-024-02423-x.


The Development and Implementation of New Assessment Tools for the Surgical Clerkship Rotation.

Kolar M, Katsoulas E, Toprak A, Nowlan-Suart T, Davidson L, Winthrop A MedEdPublish (2016). 2023; 7:4.

PMID: 38089241 PMC: 10711974. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2018.000004.1.


Validation of Task-Specific Rating Scale for Open Balloon Catheter Arterial Embolectomy: An Assessor-Blinded Quasi-Experimental Pilot Study.

Siddiqui N, Hashmi S, Naz I, Sophie Z Ann Vasc Dis. 2023; 15(4):289-294.

PMID: 36644262 PMC: 9816037. DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.22-00047.