» Articles » PMID: 19700247

The Role of Adjuvant Radiation in Uterine Sarcomas

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2009 Aug 25
PMID 19700247
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To determine clinical and pathological factors significant for overall survival (OS) and local-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) in uterine sarcoma as they relate to adjuvant radiotherapy (AR).

Methods And Materials: A retrospective analysis of 3,650 patients with uterine sarcoma was conducted using the National Oncology Database, a proprietary database of aggregated tumor registries owned by Impac Medical Systems (Sunnyvale, CA). Adjuvant radiotherapy was defined as postoperative external beam radiation to the pelvis, with or without brachytherapy. Prognostic factors were identified by multivariate analysis (MVA) using the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival, with significant differences (p < 0.05) determined using the log-rank test.

Results: The median follow-up time was 59 months, with a 5-year OS of 37%. Significant prognostic factors for OS were stage, race/ethnicity, grade, age, histology, lymph node status, and surgical treatment (p < 0.01 for all factors). Use of AR was not predictive for OS. For nonmetastatic cancer patients receiving definitive surgery (n = 2,206), the 5-year LRFFS was 87%. In this group, stage, grade, histology, and AR were prognostic for LRFFS (p < 0.05), with AR associated with improved outcome compared with surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.4, p < 0.001). Patients with carcinosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, poorly differentiated tumors, and negative lymph nodes had reduced local-regional failure (LRF) with AR (log-rank, p < 0.05 for all).

Conclusion: In the largest retrospective analysis of uterine sarcoma published thus far, AR conferred a 53% reduction in the risk of LRF at 5 years. Use of AR may have broader indications than what are currently accepted in clinical practice.

Citing Articles

Uterine sarcomas: clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up, by Spanish group for research on sarcomas (GEIS).

Perez-Fidalgo J, Ortega E, Ponce J, Redondo A, Sevilla I, Valverde C Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2023; 15:17588359231157645.

PMID: 37007636 PMC: 10052607. DOI: 10.1177/17588359231157645.


Sarcoma of the Uterus. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry No. 015/074, April 2021).

Denschlag D, Ackermann S, Battista M, Cremer W, Egerer G, Fehr M Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2022; 82(12):1337-1367.

PMID: 36467974 PMC: 9715351. DOI: 10.1055/a-1897-5124.


Low-Grade Uterine Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma: Prognostic Analysis of Clinico-Pathological Characteristics, Surgical Management, and Adjuvant Treatments. Experience From Two Referral Centers.

Borella F, Bertero L, Cassoni P, Piovano E, Gallio N, Preti M Front Oncol. 2022; 12:883344.

PMID: 35847944 PMC: 9280128. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.883344.


Development and validation of tumor-size-stratified prognostic nomograms for patients with uterine sarcoma: A SEER database analysis.

Cao S, Liao X, Xu K, Xiao H, Shi Z, Zou Y Cancer Med. 2022; 12(2):1339-1349.

PMID: 35841316 PMC: 9883420. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.5014.


Primary characteristics and outcomes of newly diagnosed low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma.

Smith E, Jansen C, Miller K, Chiang S, Alektiar K, Hensley M Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022; 32(7):882-890.

PMID: 35641004 PMC: 9256804. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003383.