» Articles » PMID: 19691430

Gram-negative Prosthetic Joint Infections: Risk Factors and Outcome of Treatment

Overview
Journal Clin Infect Dis
Date 2009 Aug 21
PMID 19691430
Citations 91
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Little information is available regarding the demographic characteristics and outcomes of patients with prosthetic joint infection (PJI) resulting from gram-negative (GN) organisms, compared with patients with PJI resulting from gram-positive (GP) organisms.

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of all cases of PJI that were treated at our institution during the period from 2000 through 2006.

Results: GN microorganisms were involved in 53 (15%) of 346 first-time episodes of PJI, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most commonly isolated pathogen (21 [40%] of the 53 episodes). Patients with GN PJI were older (median age, 68 vs. 59 years; P<.001) and developed infection earlier (median joint age, 74 vs. 109 days; P<.001) than those with GP PJI. Of the 53 episodes of GN PJI, 27 (51%) were treated with debridement, 16 (30%) with 2-stage exchange arthroplasty, and 10 (19%) with resection arthroplasty. Treating GN PJI with debridement was associated with a lower 2-year cumulative probability of success than treating GP PJI with debridement (27% vs. 47% of episodes were successfully treated; P=.002); no difference was found when a PJI was treated with 2-stage exchange or resection arthroplasty. A longer duration of symptoms before treatment with debridement was associated with treatment failure for GN PJI, compared with for GP PJI (median duration of symptoms, 11 vs. 5 days; P=.02).

Conclusions: GN PJI represents a substantial proportion of all occurrences of PJI. Debridement alone has a high failure rate and should not be attempted when the duration of symptoms is long. Resection of the prosthesis, with or without subsequent reimplantation, as a result of GN PJI is associated with a favorable outcome rate that is comparable to that associated with PJI due to GP pathogens.

Citing Articles

Antimicrobial Treatment Options for Multidrug Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens in Bone and Joint Infections.

Tsilika M, Ntziora F, Giannitsioti E Pathogens. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 40005507 PMC: 11858038. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens14020130.


Qualitative Comparison of Cultured Skin Microbiota From the Inguinal Region of Obese and Nonobese Patients Eligible for Hip Arthroplasty.

Anderson P, Frank T, Herz M, Kurzai O, Rudert M, Heinz T Arthroplast Today. 2025; 30():101483.

PMID: 39822911 PMC: 11735917. DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2024.101483.


The impact of pathogen sensitivity to antibiotics loaded in cement on the number of revisions and costs in the treatment of periprosthetic knee infection.

Davulcu C, Ozer M, Afacan M, Elibollar C, Kaynak G, Unlu M Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024; 35(1):42.

PMID: 39708185 DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-04166-4.


Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Periprosthetic Infections with the BioFire System within a Time-Dependent and Bacterium-Dependent Protocol: Review and Prosthesis-Saving Protocol.

Sangaletti R, Andriollo L, Montagna A, Franzoni S, Colombini P, Perticarini L Biomedicines. 2024; 12(9).

PMID: 39335595 PMC: 11428812. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12092082.


Risk Factors for Therapeutic Failure and One-Year Mortality in Patients with Intramedullary Nail-Associated Infection after Trochanteric and Subtrochanteric Hip Fracture Repair.

Pfang B, Villegas Garcia M, Garcia A, Aunon Rubio A, Esteban J, Garcia Canete J Antibiotics (Basel). 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38786191 PMC: 11118869. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13050463.